... and you know what else would significantly impact low-speed cornering, where mechanical grip is king?
A chassis issue.
Are you replying to me? If so, I speculated that chassis damage was the result of excessive bottoming which they were trying to mitigate in the 1st stint (engine modes) and 2nd stint (Leclerc reported that he can feel a change from the pitstop on lap 23 and then said they lose the podium on lap 27, long before the pace fully collapsed). I think the chassis damage is connected to the plank wear.catent wrote: ↑06 Aug 2025, 19:19The higher tire PSI could impact low-speed performance, yes. It is a possibility the team increased tire PSI, and if they did, they likely did so in order to err on the side of caution when it came to plank wear. But it also seems unlikely that the tire PSI increase explains ALL of Leclerc's drop in pace.
This 'either-or' notion that some hold, where this is entirely explained by plank wear, and nothing else, is reductive and unrealistically limiting the scope of this discussion about what may have occurred.
It is absolutely possible - if not highly likely at this point - that Leclerc was dealing with reduced performance due to increased tire PSI (to err on the side of caution re: plank wear), AND experienced a chassis issue that tanked his pace more than just the tire PSI adjustments alone. The fact Vasseur said the team was considering retiring the car basically confirms that this was more than just tire PSI / plank wear concerns.
The fact that the team may have been monitoring/managing plank wear via tire PSI, does not preclude the existence of a chassis issue, and vice-versa.
It's wearing of the Plank. Not "do not touch the plank." of course he's gonna take high speed corners as fast as he can while he can.SoulPancake13 wrote: ↑06 Aug 2025, 16:23If Ferrari had plank issues, then Charles would not be taking high speed corners the way he did even in that 3rd stint. The issues at low speed corners clearly indicate another issue - maybe the tyre pressures increasing put the car totally out of the window there but I guess we will never know.
Said that I am not a fan of any other team, at least of another driver, it would be very welcome if you show up in another team thread and share your different opinions, that would stimulate a frank discussion over topics, against usual fairytale telling mood of fans, which unfortunately is very common among Ferrari fans and fueled by Italian press (I say this as Italian, I know my chickens).catent wrote: ↑06 Aug 2025, 19:05Why do fans of others teams show up for no other reason than to throw dirt on individuals sharing information about the Ferrari team?Sergej wrote: ↑06 Aug 2025, 10:04bwoah, classic PR management from AR here...."setup still to be refined", "potential to be extracted"....maybe in Abu Dhabi they will be able to extract this mythological potentialScuderiaLeo wrote: ↑06 Aug 2025, 08:58From Duchessa and AR... note that this can be considered "preliminary info" since it's published right after the weekend and there hasn't been much time to examine things. They'll probably update it if they learn more specifics over the break.
also, I don't get the last sentence "after all, the front suspension cannot be altered." front suspension ? they always said that the change in the front suspension has been flawless, why is it becoming a factor now ?
Can you imagine if I rocked up in a RBR thread talking about the inherent bias of Dutch reporters, claiming their information is bunk, and that they are the team's propaganda arm? It would be a terrible, ugly look, would not be well-received, and I would be entirely out of my lane, commenting on something I am relatively uninformed about.
This is a Ferrari thread, with fans of the team sharing information to discuss. When someone shows up expressly to trash the information being shared, undermine its credibility, make bombastic statements, and add nothing of value to the discussion, that is toxic.
This idea of blaming Carlos is honestly some tiny niche thing, not a mainstream opinion. I've seen very, very few people actually pushing this.Emag wrote: ↑06 Aug 2025, 22:27Not really relevant to the current conversation, but I have been reading the thread lately and just wanted to make a comment on some things I noticed being said consistently.
I think diehard Ferrari fans don’t want to admit this, but Carlos was probably the best nr 2 driver Ferrari has had in ages. Him together with Charles was arguably a much better pairing than Chatles and Lewis currently (could be proven wrong next year). It’s honestly a bit of a scapegoat mentality that Italian media and Ferrari fanatics come up with these weird ideas that somehow Carlos is actually to blame somewhat for the poor performance this year because apparently he said something about the power steering last year that Ferrari took into consideration?? From a driver leaving the team? Just total nonsense.
Carlos was a really talented driver that had the missfortune of being paired up against arguably the joint-best (second best at worst) talented driver of the modern era together with Verstappen.
Ferrari fans like to point out Baku last year as the reason for Ferrari losing the WCC but its just the nature of the sport. Many what ifs develop throughout the season.
The truth is that Carlos was really really close to Charles (relatively speaking), and you could often count on him to pick up the pieces when Charles had a rare off day.
You're fine man. This isn't a fan topic, this is a topic to talk about Ferrari, and you dont need some badge to input your opinion.Sergej wrote: ↑06 Aug 2025, 22:28Said that I am not a fan of any other team, at least of another driver, it would be very welcome if you show up in another team thread and share your different opinions, that would stimulate a frank discussion over topics, against usual fairytale telling mood of fans, which unfortunately is very common among Ferrari fans and fueled by Italian press (I say this as Italian, I know my chickens).
I can only speak about my local Scuderia Ferrari club(which has over 4k members last time I checked) but Sainz was very well liked and the general reaction when it was announced he was leaving was "that sucks", not "Yay!"Seanspeed wrote: ↑06 Aug 2025, 22:35
This idea of blaming Carlos is honestly some tiny niche thing, not a mainstream opinion. I've seen very, very few people actually pushing this.
And I also think saying Leclerc-Sainz was probably our best pairing in a very long time would be a downright popular opinion among Ferrari fans. Sainz was obviously not amazing and had periods of underperforming that frustrated us, but he was quite frequently a strong point of the team, and also had a nasty habit of having a great weekend specifically in situations where Leclerc was dealing with some unfortunate circumstances which of course annoyed many of Leclerc's more diehard fans.
But I think among just general Ferrari fans, Sainz was pretty well appreciated, and not just in hindsight. Many people did not think Lewis would be some slam-dunk upgrade.