This is the problem, we don't know if Horner can do this! He's the among the set of team principals who are not technical.. Hired in a time to oversee and police on behalf of another big boss. Not much sturctural building skills are required. People on the inside might say he got really good people from the start already to build these structures for him.Alakshendra wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025, 17:20Honestly i dont favor Horner but fact is he can do things which are needed in Ferrari.
Build a system, not just a car, clear roles, short decision paths, and accountability that bites.
Ruthless performance management: weak links get fixed fast (people, process, suppliers).
Driver & media containment, he shields engineers from circus noise so the factory iterates in peace.
Now what ferrari really need
Governance clarity, one boss with real authority from board to garage. No committee racing.
Process discipline pre-briefs/after-action reviews that actually change behavior (strategy errors there weren’t “bad luck,” they were process failures).
Hiring freedom, let the boss import lieutenants in aero, strategy, ops, and build a spine around them.
Comms control, fewer headlines, more lap time. Shut the leaks, standardize messaging.
We are lacking at places and team looks like a clown show, its worth the risk to give Horner a chance.
Fingers crossed Ferrari is anticipting the temperatures for the race and set up the car around that. Otherwise... It's looking very grim..
Ferrari are not able to properly setup the car for the track that they have under their nose, let alone anticipate for the track on Sunday which will be just a couple of degrees colder. Truth is the car is a turd which has not been updated for months, actually has been downgraded with that amazing new rear suspension. As I said, it'll be 6 weekends very painful to watch.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025, 12:57Fingers crossed Ferrari is anticipting the temperatures for the race and set up the car around that. Otherwise... It's looking very grim..
Yes, we can be quite certain that Jaguar F1 was on track to recruiting Adrian Newey and Rob Marshall, and winning the double in 2010, before Horner was appointed to “police and oversee” the team.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025, 12:53This is the problem, we don't know if Horner can do this! He's the among the set of team principals who are not technical.. Hired in a time to oversee and police on behalf of another big boss. Not much sturctural building skills are required. People on the inside might say he got really good people from the start already to build these structures for him.Alakshendra wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025, 17:20Honestly i dont favor Horner but fact is he can do things which are needed in Ferrari.
Build a system, not just a car, clear roles, short decision paths, and accountability that bites.
Ruthless performance management: weak links get fixed fast (people, process, suppliers).
Driver & media containment, he shields engineers from circus noise so the factory iterates in peace.
Now what ferrari really need
Governance clarity, one boss with real authority from board to garage. No committee racing.
Process discipline pre-briefs/after-action reviews that actually change behavior (strategy errors there weren’t “bad luck,” they were process failures).
Hiring freedom, let the boss import lieutenants in aero, strategy, ops, and build a spine around them.
Comms control, fewer headlines, more lap time. Shut the leaks, standardize messaging.
We are lacking at places and team looks like a clown show, its worth the risk to give Horner a chance.
Yes, we can be quite certain that Jaguar F1 was on track to recruiting Adrian Newey and Rob Marshall, and winning the double a few years later, before Horner was appointed to “police and oversee” the team.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025, 12:53This is the problem, we don't know if Horner can do this! He's the among the set of team principals who are not technical.. Hired in a time to oversee and police on behalf of another big boss. Not much sturctural building skills are required. People on the inside might say he got really good people from the start already to build these structures for him.Alakshendra wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025, 17:20Honestly i dont favor Horner but fact is he can do things which are needed in Ferrari.
Build a system, not just a car, clear roles, short decision paths, and accountability that bites.
Ruthless performance management: weak links get fixed fast (people, process, suppliers).
Driver & media containment, he shields engineers from circus noise so the factory iterates in peace.
Now what ferrari really need
Governance clarity, one boss with real authority from board to garage. No committee racing.
Process discipline pre-briefs/after-action reviews that actually change behavior (strategy errors there weren’t “bad luck,” they were process failures).
Hiring freedom, let the boss import lieutenants in aero, strategy, ops, and build a spine around them.
Comms control, fewer headlines, more lap time. Shut the leaks, standardize messaging.
We are lacking at places and team looks like a clown show, its worth the risk to give Horner a chance.
Hamilton came to Ferrari because of Fred Vasseur. That's it. If he goes Hamilton goes...Sergej wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025, 13:30Ferrari are not able to properly setup the car for the track that they have under their nose, let alone anticipate for the track on Sunday which will be just a couple of degrees colder. Truth is the car is a turd which has not been updated for months, actually has been downgraded with that amazing new rear suspension. As I said, it'll be 6 weekends very painful to watch.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025, 12:57Fingers crossed Ferrari is anticipting the temperatures for the race and set up the car around that. Otherwise... It's looking very grim..
Horner didn't attract Newey, it was David Coulthard who did.
And who recruited Coulthard? It was a joint operation. Horner wanted Newey and he found a way to approach him through DC.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025, 16:22Horner didn't attract Newey, it was David Coulthard who did.
Rob Marshall joined on his own ambitions applying for a career step-up. It wasn't any head hunting situation.
Anyway, you are as only as good as your last race and Horner ended up repelling people from his own team... Very unlikely people will be attracted to work with him now if he goes to Ferrari. Too much baggage. Too much risk of division and making matters worse.
It's a bit of stretch to say all these things were coincidence.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025, 16:22Horner didn't attract Newey, it was David Coulthard who did.
Rob Marshall joined on his own ambitions applying for a career step-up. It wasn't any head hunting situation.
Anyway, you are as only as good as your last race and Horner ended up repelling people from his own team... Very unlikely people will be attracted to work with him now if he goes to Ferrari. Too much baggage. Too much risk of division and making matters worse.
Since Zandvoort they don't have an actual good setup in FP1, any good result in fp1 comes from high engine modes.ScuderiaLeo wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025, 20:09In the media pen the drivers seem confident the team has found the proper direction for tomorrow, they used different settings today to refine data and make up for the loss yesterday. I hope they're right..![]()
Won’t matter if they start from row 4 or 5 on the gridScuderiaLeo wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025, 20:09In the media pen the drivers seem confident the team has found the proper direction for tomorrow, they used different settings today to refine data and make up for the loss yesterday. I hope they're right..![]()