I also noticed the sound of the Ferrari PU's electric motor is much more noticeable than in Mercedes and Red Bull/Ford power units.
I also noticed the sound of the Ferrari PU's electric motor is much more noticeable than in Mercedes and Red Bull/Ford power units.
The horrible scaffolding propping up the bargeboard must have an aero purpose. Are they using that part to generate vortices outward and/or into the sidepod channel?
Uff... Gazzetta dello Sport now says the mechanism are hidden inside the endplates... is that possible?sucof wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 17:02It would make very little sense at the endplates, as you would need lots of ducting, 1 more actuator and more obstruction of airflow.Giando wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 16:36so where do you think is the front wing mechanism for X / X modes?
is it in the middle of the wing or on the sides?
https://i.ibb.co/V0XnPrN6/Screenshot-20 ... -30-16.png
And you can see, it is under the nosecone. At the ends, those are just the rotating points.
That would make no sense. Also, then what is that device that looks exactly like an actuator under the nose??Giando wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 21:00Uff... Gazzetta dello Sport now says the mechanism are hidden inside the endplates... is that possible?sucof wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 17:02It would make very little sense at the endplates, as you would need lots of ducting, 1 more actuator and more obstruction of airflow.Giando wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 16:36so where do you think is the front wing mechanism for X / X modes?
is it in the middle of the wing or on the sides?
https://i.ibb.co/V0XnPrN6/Screenshot-20 ... -30-16.png
And you can see, it is under the nosecone. At the ends, those are just the rotating points.

2017 regulation changes: Ferrari aerodynamically and mechanically the best car initially, just hugely underpowered against the PU of Mercedes.
That’s just marketing. They’re not gonna write the real weight there although I agree they are probably at minimum weight.Luscion wrote:Looks like the SF-26 is pretty much at the minimum weight limit
It's not like they would publish any number other than that if they didn't achieve minimum weight.Luscion wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:04Looks like the SF-26 is pretty much at the minimum weight limit
https://i.postimg.cc/mDfnbPTY/VIps9v0.png
Are you sure you guys are not fooled by the drone propellers noise? There was a drone filming in every car shakedown we had until now so far
In addition to that, having it in the endplate puts it where it's easily damaged (even if the endplates are not as far out as the '25 cars). Any damage to the wing and you are forced to immediately make a long stop to replace it. No chance to make it to your next scheduled stop, or even leave it the whole race like they have done previously.
I agree that the actuator is in the center, but having it in the endplates would help reducing losses. Obviously it would be an issue for in-race contacts, but (1) front wings are more narrow now, so they would likely bump wheels first and (2) I think even with the actuator in the middle a contact may cause enough damage to ruin the system.matt_s wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:46In addition to that, having it in the endplate puts it where it's easily damaged (even if the endplates are not as far out as the '25 cars). Any damage to the wing and you are forced to immediately make a long stop to replace it. No chance to make it to your next scheduled stop, or even leave it the whole race like they have done previously.
This is my issue with this generation… end plate damage is going to knock out the active aero, and require immediate pit to correctmatt_s wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:46In addition to that, having it in the endplate puts it where it's easily damaged (even if the endplates are not as far out as the '25 cars). Any damage to the wing and you are forced to immediately make a long stop to replace it. No chance to make it to your next scheduled stop, or even leave it the whole race like they have done previously.