2026 car comparisons

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Badger
Badger
12
Joined: 22 Sep 2025, 17:00

2026 car comparisons

Post

All the cars we've seen on track so far and the best images available.
ImageImage
Image
Image
Cadillac
Image
Audi
Image

So far I'd say Merc looks the most advanced in terms of tight packaging and innovative bits. Second is VCARB. Third Alpine.

chlebekf1
chlebekf1
0
Joined: 24 Feb 2018, 12:32

Re: 2026 car comparisons

Post

Mercedes 1 Alpine 2

Badger
Badger
12
Joined: 22 Sep 2025, 17:00

Re: 2026 car comparisons

Post

Image
Image

User avatar
lio007
326
Joined: 28 Jan 2013, 23:03
Location: Austria

Re: 2026 car comparisons

Post

I think with Cadillac, Ferrari and Merc we have 3 teams having a diffuser opening.

Cadillac
Image

vorticism
vorticism
377
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20
Location: YooEssay

Re: 2026 car comparisons

Post

Merc and Ferrari:
-Similar sidepod undercuts
-Front wings preferencing installation stiffness. Merc centered the pylons within the wing area by way of the second element, which limits the FWAS to a single element. Ferrari carries both the center and the front of the wing area by way of a large first element, which allows a smaller two-element FWAS

All cars:
-They have the new side indicators. Very visible on the Ferrari. Little rectangular LED lights.
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

User avatar
Giando
93
Joined: 10 Jan 2012, 17:56
Location: Milan (Italy)

Re: 2026 car comparisons

Post

where i've seen those Ferrari and Mercedes sidepod shape before?

mmmm

Image

f1316
f1316
87
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 18:36

Re: 2026 car comparisons

Post

Giando wrote:
23 Jan 2026, 16:49
where i've seen those Ferrari and Mercedes sidepod shape before?

mmmm

https://i.ibb.co/cKw2sGSK/Screenshot-20 ... -39-32.png
Yes, I’ve said this a few places but there’s definite trend towards the “coanda” style sidepods from 2012/13 (of the McLaren variety) this year. I guess it makes sense that they want to feed the diffuser airflow in a similar sense to how they wanted to feed it hot exhaust gases, but I do now wonder if it’s this diffuser “hole” trick that has pushed them in that direction now.

vorticism
vorticism
377
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20
Location: YooEssay

Re: 2026 car comparisons

Post

You both raise an interesting point, to me at least. Those Coanda type sidepods lofted the exhaust over top the inflow arriving from the undercut. If they end up using big cooling louvers or sidepod cannons it might again be a way to loft a heated airstream over the undercut inwash. Not necessarily to energize the diffuser but simply to steer the efflux through the rear suspension members which cause drag & turbulence anyway, so why not blast them with the radiator efflux while the diffuser gets clean undercut inwash. If the Meredith effect can be achieved below 300kph via tuned, short path ducting (sidepod cannons, f.e.) then the radiator outflow could be slightly more energetic than ambient airflow, in which case, maybe you would want them to feed the diffuser. Radiator blown diffuser.

vorticism wrote:
14 Aug 2025, 18:24
All told I see one major potential differentiation available across teams: a FWAS that has either one, two, or four rotating flaps. Another less visible one will be the choice to use a hydraulic piston or an electromechanical actuator.
Already all three FWAS variations have been seen.
VCARB: 4-element
Ferrari: 2-element
Mercedes: 1-element

Correct me if I'm wrong but the regulations seem to indicate the there are also three potential rear wing variations:
1-element rear wing with no RWAS
2-element rear wing with 1-element RWAS
3-element rear wing with 2-element RWAS (all we've seen yet)
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿