Zhouvinazzi wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 02:44
Vinlarr89 wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 23:39
One of the worst commercial relationships of all time visually
Why has this become such a forced meme? As if there aren't much worse examples of corporate sponsors ruining liveries, like Google on the Mclaren. The car looks great imo, up there with Red Bull for best livery of the year. I suppose this is all subjective, but aesthetically the colors blue and red work very well together and the white on the engine cover is iconic.
I also think, in general, the hatred of the blue HP is slightly overblown. It can be done well. I think a big problem people have with HP is not the logo itself. It’s the fact that there is clearly a deliberate choice to use the full-color blue-and-white variant of the logo which is seldom used elsewhere. Look at Renault 2010. Look at other recent HP sponsorships in racing (for example, they sponsored William Byron in NASCAR a few times over the past few seasons). None of them use the full blue logo except when the car is plain white, which the Ferrari as a whole will never be. HP has the blue and white logo, a monochrome version of that, or even their “modern” logo with the four stripes (which I personally think they should have used because, selfishly, it would look like a censored Marlboro livery).
I think peoples’ disdain for the HP integration is caused—or at least amplified—by the fact that they know that *any* of the officially-used alternatives would be more visually satisfying.
All that being said, I have seen very few sponsors drum up this level of rancor in such a short time. I’m sure if they had just put a white or black logo on a red background it would look more coherent. But nobody would be talking about it and so that would partially defeat the point of a sponsorship in the first place…
"You can't argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience"
- Mark Twain