U already know that Honda doesn't have potent PU like Mercedes or Ferrari. How?f1Follower wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 20:11I don't think AM will be challenging for championships until Honda delivers potent PU like Mercedes or Ferrari.
Neweys car only started to win when Honda delivered engine same as Mercedes
What do you think happens when the backen of any other designs is hit? Damage, including suspension damage.
Maybe it does already. Maybe it's better then all the rest. We don't know anything...f1Follower wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 20:11I don't think AM will be challenging for championships until Honda delivers potent PU like Mercedes or Ferrari.
Neweys car only started to win when Honda delivered engine same as Mercedes
There is a rear crash structure and rear crash structure test they have to pass.
In reality those are quite far from the end of the crash structure.
Aston Martin will hold a filming day at Montmeló tomorrow.
Those 200km (42 laps) will be their third day of testing, as I mentioned yesterday on the live stream.
Crawford will be driving the AMR26.
It looks like the VCARB has the same rear upper wishbone mounting system as Aston Martin with a stub above the gearbox. It sort of reminds me of the old front suspension keel mount for the lower wishbone, as on the Ferrari F2005.
Want to talk about '97, where Williams dominated the drivers' and constructors' championships? And then what happened the following year? McLaren dominated. From one year to the next, there was one name that made the difference, and that was Adrian Newey. Can the individual make the difference? If you're the greatest engineer in the history of F1, absolutely. Just look at the rear suspension: it's crossed and has lots of spaces where it passes.the air. That's probably aerodynamic suspension, not mechanical (yes is referring to rb16b). Even engine decisions (after Honda's statements) must be related to chassis and aerodynamics, at the request of Aston (they themselves at Honda think it was Newey who asks for it). Also the front suspension in the arm where the badge board is horizontal and not vertical probably aerodynamic and not mechanical. There are several solutions that are also reminiscent of Ferrari and in my opinion there is Cardile's signature, but others are impressive, look at the rear pylons (very similar to the 2009 McLaren). There are in my opinion a lot of talented people in this team, in the last few years Aston has been one of the most interesting teams in terms of the solutions they have brought (regardless of whether they have worked or not). However, I think they need someone to lead them. I don't know if this car will be any good, a lot will depend on the engine, but regardless, Newey is Newey, let's not joke.Xyz22 wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 14:05It’s hilarious to look where McLaren and Red Bull were before Newey.mzso wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 14:03You shouldn't diminish the effect of experience and brilliance. Someone needs to make the big decisions. And that's where it matters, a lot. Ferrari had all the budget and people and infrastructure they wanted since forever.ScottB wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 13:04We have a societal / cultural desire to believe there's always 'a guy' behind everything, the lone genius at the controls that can do anything and everything, just like in the movies.
Not to diminish a guy like Newey, or Brawn etc etc but especially in the modern era, these are vast teams of talented folk.
Yet, the last time they won was in 2007 and even that was a McLaren blunder/handout.
McLaren before Newey were already a multiple WCC winning team.Xyz22 wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 14:05It’s hilarious to look where McLaren and Red Bull were before Newey.mzso wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 14:03You shouldn't diminish the effect of experience and brilliance. Someone needs to make the big decisions. And that's where it matters, a lot. Ferrari had all the budget and people and infrastructure they wanted since forever.ScottB wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 13:04We have a societal / cultural desire to believe there's always 'a guy' behind everything, the lone genius at the controls that can do anything and everything, just like in the movies.
Not to diminish a guy like Newey, or Brawn etc etc but especially in the modern era, these are vast teams of talented folk.
Yet, the last time they won was in 2007 and even that was a McLaren blunder/handout.
Exactly. It is a terrible human practice to pin all the credit to one person, who did not even come up with most of the good ideas.WardenOfTheNorth wrote: ↑31 Jan 2026, 09:56McLaren before Newey were already a multiple WCC winning team.Xyz22 wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 14:05It’s hilarious to look where McLaren and Red Bull were before Newey.mzso wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 14:03
You shouldn't diminish the effect of experience and brilliance. Someone needs to make the big decisions. And that's where it matters, a lot. Ferrari had all the budget and people and infrastructure they wanted since forever.
Yet, the last time they won was in 2007 and even that was a McLaren blunder/handout.
I've said many times that being an aero engineer in a team where Newey works must be an awful feeling sometimes.
You could be the person who comes up with an innovative solution, which ends up on the car and all the public credit will go to..... Newey....
How is that different for anybody working on any other team?WardenOfTheNorth wrote: ↑31 Jan 2026, 09:56I've said many times that being an aero engineer in a team where Newey works must be an awful feeling sometimes.
You could be the person who comes up with an innovative solution, which ends up on the car and all the public credit will go to..... Newey....