Well, he just flat out admitted it, didn't he. I have to say, I am sorry, but legality is not measured by number of teams running something dubious, lol.
This is the first time I see someone with inside knowledge actually admit that this bluntly.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑11 Feb 2026, 12:11He said if you change the rules and measure at working temperature, we may be in breach.
Not really a revelation.
No, the rule does not say at ambient temp, it says it may never be higher than 16... It's only the test that says ambient temp.
We only have the hearsay (almost certainly accurate, but without evidence still only hearsay) of an engineer who has moved from one engine manufacturer to another and revealed their knowledge of the supposed ruse. That’s the only reason the compliance of the engine is being questioned. Not evidence. Hearsay. If a way could be devised to measure the compression ratio when in operation and it was found to be over, that’s a different matter.
...
But for well over a decade, every single car has exceeded the legal amount of flex when at speed, though complied when measured stationary. So not a single car has been compliant ‘at all times’ in the last decade, probably more. It was impractical to rigidly (sorry for the pun) apply that ‘at all times’ part of the regulation because there was no way of measuring it in action, even though it was absolutely visible from the cameras on the cars.
Why is he lying lol? Already downplaying the advantage to look good in Melbourne