The smaller tires of these regs are presumably more prone to overheating-degradation than the previous gen due to their smaller contact patch and lower mass,Emag wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 18:36We have no idea how overweight McLaren are though. If it's 10kg then that's significant. If it's 5kg then not so much. In any case, this test has been much harder than last year to take things away from. There's also this huge question mark looming over the whole thing with regards to the Mercedes PU. If what Max said last week about them potentially hiding 20 HP in this test, then that could change the picture significantly for the Mercedes-powered teams when we start proper racing.AR3-GP wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 18:25Lando Norris explained the degradation problem:SoulPancake13 wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 18:23
I mean, yes, but how much weight can McLaren lose to reduce a deficit like that... they have a pretty massive deg problem right now IMO, you can't just fix that with weight reduction although it will helphttps://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/land ... /10798914/Things worked better, and then we could drive quicker. At the minute, we're a little bit off. So to match the race pace of some of the others, we have to push a bit more, and then we have more degradation.
I don't know where Mclaren will be in melbourne, but in theory they will be a little bit better if they can lighten the car.
I wouldn't say the biggest effect is the smaller tires. I think the MGU-K deployment and harvesting torque just rips the rear tires apart unless you have a lot of load on the rear. This is something Ferrari might have unlocked with their exhaust blown diffuser element.McFAN wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 18:50The smaller tires of these regs are presumably more prone to overheating-degradation than the previous gen due to their smaller contact patch and lower mass,Emag wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 18:36We have no idea how overweight McLaren are though. If it's 10kg then that's significant. If it's 5kg then not so much. In any case, this test has been much harder than last year to take things away from. There's also this huge question mark looming over the whole thing with regards to the Mercedes PU. If what Max said last week about them potentially hiding 20 HP in this test, then that could change the picture significantly for the Mercedes-powered teams when we start proper racing.AR3-GP wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 18:25
Lando Norris explained the degradation problem:
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/land ... /10798914/
I don't know where Mclaren will be in melbourne, but in theory they will be a little bit better if they can lighten the car.
So even a marginal weight saving would have an outsize effect on their durability no ?
TeamKoolGreen wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 05:21This is not true at all. WRC got rid of hybrid and used sustainable fuel in 2025. Ben Sulayem has a lot of power and he supports the idea. He has already chaired meetings about it. So you are just wrong.
If you got rid of the MGU-H, you might as well not have hybrids at all. It was the one thing that actually made hybrids functional in F1. Even going back to the 2014 configuration with an equal displacement V8 would be fine by me.
I think it is/was little more than a populist exercise. IMO the chance for it actually happenning is remote.edu2703 wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 05:33Well above zero. What's currently being discussed for the next regulation change is precisely the return of the 2.4L naturally aspirated V8 and a reduction in electrification to around 220 kWh.
I would say that it's quite plausible that this will actually happen. A simpler, less complex, cheaper engine with less dependence on electricity and no turbo, running entirely on sustainable fuel. If the current engine proves to be bad, there will be a lot of pressure to introduce this new regulation before 2031.
The tires are narrower but just a bit so. I doubt it will make a noticeable impact as they still are confortably larger than what they had untill 2017
Artur Craft wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 19:44The pecking order is so clear that everybody is predicting the same on the appropriate thread.
I found that Ferrari's AM sim was the best out of anyone who has completed a full sim, even accounting for the extra pitstop, but I could be mistaken. You also have to consider LEC did his sim when the track was 44-47C when Piastri and Verstappen did theirs in much cooler conditions.Alan Dove wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 20:35Unless my math is completely wrong. Accounting for red flag, and the 3-stopper for LeClerc... Mclaren are slightly ahead of Ferrari and RedBull close behind? Nothing here out of the margin of 'engine mode' error. All pretty close. max was driving to a very specific lap time target as well in his last stint on the C2s compared to Piastri's C1s.
McLaren race sim was done in significantly better conditions.Alan Dove wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 20:35Unless my math is completely wrong. Accounting for red flag, and the 3-stopper for LeClerc... Mclaren are slightly ahead of Ferrari and RedBull close behind? Nothing here out of the margin of 'engine mode' error. All pretty close. max was driving to a very specific lap time target as well in his last stint on the C2s compared to Piastri's C1s.
Obviously we haven't seen them actually race yet, but a number of the traits of these cars look like they could promote good racing.McL-H wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 20:43To me this is not F1 anymore. These regulations are extremely dull. Look how slow they are through the corners. Why why do they keep messing up this racing series so bad? All it needed was last year regulations with proper screaming V10 engine, bio fuel if they please. No no. Lada cornering is what we get.