The smaller tires of these regs are presumably more prone to overheating-degradation than the previous gen due to their smaller contact patch and lower mass,Emag wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 18:36We have no idea how overweight McLaren are though. If it's 10kg then that's significant. If it's 5kg then not so much. In any case, this test has been much harder than last year to take things away from. There's also this huge question mark looming over the whole thing with regards to the Mercedes PU. If what Max said last week about them potentially hiding 20 HP in this test, then that could change the picture significantly for the Mercedes-powered teams when we start proper racing.AR3-GP wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 18:25Lando Norris explained the degradation problem:SoulPancake13 wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 18:23
I mean, yes, but how much weight can McLaren lose to reduce a deficit like that... they have a pretty massive deg problem right now IMO, you can't just fix that with weight reduction although it will helphttps://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/land ... /10798914/Things worked better, and then we could drive quicker. At the minute, we're a little bit off. So to match the race pace of some of the others, we have to push a bit more, and then we have more degradation.
I don't know where Mclaren will be in melbourne, but in theory they will be a little bit better if they can lighten the car.
So even a marginal weight saving would have an outsize effect on their durability no ?


