I dont know how anybody can determine what cars are good at what tracks given the sample of one, and that just being a test, not an actual competitive race. lolf1316 wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 19:49Posted previously: https://x.com/f1debrief/status/2024790259247034687/
This to me is the most encouraging thing. Given the time of day, I would say that this is possibly the best race sim we’ve seen (when corrected for high temps) and I think it bodes well for the drivability of the car and how it looks after tyres. Coupled with what seems to be a start advantage, it ought to mean good races.
The one lap pace was very good but I’m sceptical about how much Mercedes is keeping in reserve. Just gut but they certainly seem confident and I think they’ll crank it up a notch in Melbourne. Much was made in commentary (led by the Mercedes sim driver Ant Davidson…) that Bahrain suits Ferrari more than other tracks - I’m not entirely sure how much I believe that (a drivable car with smooth delivery and good tyre life is a good thing on pretty much all tracks) but it’ll be something to look out for.
I think it’s been a very good pre season and although there’s still a lot we don’t know (eg engine modes/fuel loads, Melbourne upgrades etc) I am cautiously optimistic.
Commentary guys always just gotta yap about something, I guess. Hard to find things to talk about over an 8 hour test.


