Seanspeed wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 19:54
f1316 wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 19:49
Vinlarr89 wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 19:37
Has anyone got any of the data from the long runs today?
Posted previously:
https://x.com/f1debrief/status/2024790259247034687/
This to me is the most encouraging thing. Given the time of day, I would say that this is possibly the best race sim we’ve seen (when corrected for high temps) and I think it bodes well for the drivability of the car and how it looks after tyres. Coupled with what seems to be a start advantage, it ought to mean good races.
The one lap pace was very good but I’m sceptical about how much Mercedes is keeping in reserve. Just gut but they certainly seem confident and I think they’ll crank it up a notch in Melbourne. Much was made in commentary (led by the Mercedes sim driver Ant Davidson…) that Bahrain suits Ferrari more than other tracks - I’m not entirely sure how much I believe that (a drivable car with smooth delivery and good tyre life is a good thing on pretty much all tracks) but it’ll be something to look out for.
I think it’s been a very good pre season and although there’s still a lot we don’t know (eg engine modes/fuel loads, Melbourne upgrades etc) I am cautiously optimistic.
I dont know how anybody can determine what cars are good at what tracks given the sample of one, and that just being a test, not an actual competitive race. lol
Commentary guys always just gotta yap about something, I guess. Hard to find things to talk about over an 8 hour test.
Yeah, I thought it was a bit spurious, especially given the source (always thought he has a big conflict of interest as a commentator tbh). But I don’t think it’s just filling time - had Mercedes been top, there would have been no such caveats, only superlative (the classic “ominous” getting trotted out). I thought it was kind of a b.s. take from Davidson (that the rest also picked up on) but it is true that Melbourne will be a very different challenge for everyone in terms of regen - Max, who I think is pretty honest and straightforward, said the same - so it could certainly be a different picture. How that impacts Ferrari I think is entirely unclear though.
Whilst I’m on it though: another silly narrative I’m hearing is that Ferrari’s (supposedly) smaller turbo means less overall power. That seems a very basic assumption imho. Have Ferrari not also used a smaller turbo throughout the previous V6 engine cycle? This really isn’t new/a surprise and hasn’t hurt them in ICE power in the past.