Is this the one?bluechris wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 13:31Guys someone posted a video i think in this thread that was showing 4 cars from above like slot cars with the virtual laps of Hamilton, Norris, Verstapen and Antonelli or Russell that you was able to see who brakes better, who accelerates better etc. i cannot seem to find it and i want it, can anyone help?
Thank you, that was it.dia6olo wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 18:11Is this the one?bluechris wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 13:31Guys someone posted a video i think in this thread that was showing 4 cars from above like slot cars with the virtual laps of Hamilton, Norris, Verstapen and Antonelli or Russell that you was able to see who brakes better, who accelerates better etc. i cannot seem to find it and i want it, can anyone help?
https://x.com/gurt___yo_ah/status/2024214245974360465
1.5s off the pace is pretty far from front-running, but also seems decent enough for Sauber.erudite450 wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 07:39That's almost frontrunning pace by the Audi !nitrotech wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 19:21Here are the race sims from today. Audi is impressive in the mid pack.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HBnKn3pXUAA ... name=large
1. Pierre Gasly Alpine -3.344 2. Arvid Lindblad VCARB -3.321 3. Gabriel Bortoleto Audi -2.915 4. Carlos Sainz Williams -2.844 5. Nico Hulkenberg Audi -2.304 6. Charles Leclerc Ferrari -2.281 7. Liam Lawson VCARB -2.276 8. Alex Albon Williams -2.238 9. Lance Stroll Aston Martin -2.191 10. Sergio Perez Cadillac -1.996 11. Franco Colapinto Alpine -1.988 12. Ollie Bearman Haas -1.907 13. Lando Norris Mclaren -1.798 14. Fernando Alonso Aston Martin -1.712 15. Max Verstappen Red Bull -1.689 16. Oscar Piastri Mclaren -1.688 17. Valtteri Bottas Cadillac -1.534 18. Esteban Ocon Haas -1.377 19. Isack Hadjar Red Bull -1.350 20. Kimi Antonelli Mercedes -0.866 21. Lewis Hamilton Ferrari -0.801 22. George Russell Mercedes -0.721I know I said "sandbagging is meaningless and gets thrown around to satisfy whoever's confirmation bias" earlier, but that very low improvement from Merc is extremely sus. Possibilities
Your prior caveat - that there is no way to accurately parse the extent to which teams are sandbagging and it's subjective speculation, often used as confirmation bias - pretty well captures/describes your theorizing which follows.upsidedowntoast wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 22:10Some more fun facts that could be actually be totally irrelevant, who knows:
https://www.gpblog.com/en/general/major ... on-testing
Ordered from highest to lowest improvement:
1. Pierre Gasly Alpine -3.344 2. Arvid Lindblad VCARB -3.321 3. Gabriel Bortoleto Audi -2.915 4. Carlos Sainz Williams -2.844 5. Nico Hulkenberg Audi -2.304 6. Charles Leclerc Ferrari -2.281 7. Liam Lawson VCARB -2.276 8. Alex Albon Williams -2.238 9. Lance Stroll Aston Martin -2.191 10. Sergio Perez Cadillac -1.996 11. Franco Colapinto Alpine -1.988 12. Ollie Bearman Haas -1.907 13. Lando Norris Mclaren -1.798 14. Fernando Alonso Aston Martin -1.712 15. Max Verstappen Red Bull -1.689 16. Oscar Piastri Mclaren -1.688 17. Valtteri Bottas Cadillac -1.534 18. Esteban Ocon Haas -1.377 19. Isack Hadjar Red Bull -1.350 20. Kimi Antonelli Mercedes -0.866 21. Lewis Hamilton Ferrari -0.801 22. George Russell Mercedes -0.721I know I said "sandbagging is meaningless and gets thrown around to satisfy whoever's confirmation bias" earlier, but that very low improvement from Merc is extremely sus. Possibilities
1. They already showed their hand in Bahrain 1
2. Their reliability issues over Bahrain 1+2 messed them up so bad that they could only test setup and didn't have time to test anything else
3. They are hiding more relative to the other teams
Which is why I put in the caveat. All this is tea leaf reading and numerology just for fun. Still cool to look at though and it would be interesting to compare across the years.catent wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 23:22Your prior caveat - that there is no way to accurately parse the extent to which teams are sandbagging and it's subjective speculation, often used as confirmation bias - pretty well captures/describes your theorizing which follows.upsidedowntoast wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 22:10Some more fun facts that could be actually be totally irrelevant, who knows:
https://www.gpblog.com/en/general/major ... on-testing
Ordered from highest to lowest improvement:
1. Pierre Gasly Alpine -3.344 2. Arvid Lindblad VCARB -3.321 3. Gabriel Bortoleto Audi -2.915 4. Carlos Sainz Williams -2.844 5. Nico Hulkenberg Audi -2.304 6. Charles Leclerc Ferrari -2.281 7. Liam Lawson VCARB -2.276 8. Alex Albon Williams -2.238 9. Lance Stroll Aston Martin -2.191 10. Sergio Perez Cadillac -1.996 11. Franco Colapinto Alpine -1.988 12. Ollie Bearman Haas -1.907 13. Lando Norris Mclaren -1.798 14. Fernando Alonso Aston Martin -1.712 15. Max Verstappen Red Bull -1.689 16. Oscar Piastri Mclaren -1.688 17. Valtteri Bottas Cadillac -1.534 18. Esteban Ocon Haas -1.377 19. Isack Hadjar Red Bull -1.350 20. Kimi Antonelli Mercedes -0.866 21. Lewis Hamilton Ferrari -0.801 22. George Russell Mercedes -0.721I know I said "sandbagging is meaningless and gets thrown around to satisfy whoever's confirmation bias" earlier, but that very low improvement from Merc is extremely sus. Possibilities
1. They already showed their hand in Bahrain 1
2. Their reliability issues over Bahrain 1+2 messed them up so bad that they could only test setup and didn't have time to test anything else
3. They are hiding more relative to the other teams
How is the Mercedes works engine so much stronger out of the corners than the McLaren Mercedes ? And no, that isn't a difference in drag.dia6olo wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 18:11Is this the one?bluechris wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 13:31Guys someone posted a video i think in this thread that was showing 4 cars from above like slot cars with the virtual laps of Hamilton, Norris, Verstapen and Antonelli or Russell that you was able to see who brakes better, who accelerates better etc. i cannot seem to find it and i want it, can anyone help?
https://x.com/gurt___yo_ah/status/2024214245974360465
McLaren were running an older less powerful version of the pu now confirmed my guess Mercedes were running the newer engine as a test bed before dishing out the restTeamKoolGreen wrote: ↑22 Feb 2026, 05:29How is the Mercedes works engine so much stronger out of the corners than the McLaren Mercedes ? And no, that isn't a difference in drag.dia6olo wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 18:11Is this the one?bluechris wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 13:31Guys someone posted a video i think in this thread that was showing 4 cars from above like slot cars with the virtual laps of Hamilton, Norris, Verstapen and Antonelli or Russell that you was able to see who brakes better, who accelerates better etc. i cannot seem to find it and i want it, can anyone help?
https://x.com/gurt___yo_ah/status/2024214245974360465
If the video is in any way accurate, looks like Antonelli is simply braking earlier hence getting a better exit than the others.TeamKoolGreen wrote: ↑22 Feb 2026, 05:29How is the Mercedes works engine so much stronger out of the corners than the McLaren Mercedes ? And no, that isn't a difference in drag.dia6olo wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 18:11Is this the one?bluechris wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 13:31Guys someone posted a video i think in this thread that was showing 4 cars from above like slot cars with the virtual laps of Hamilton, Norris, Verstapen and Antonelli or Russell that you was able to see who brakes better, who accelerates better etc. i cannot seem to find it and i want it, can anyone help?
https://x.com/gurt___yo_ah/status/2024214245974360465
It's different driving styles and electric power delivery from what i see. All teams trying different things to find the optimal.ali623 wrote: ↑22 Feb 2026, 11:07If the video is in any way accurate, looks like Antonelli is simply braking earlier hence getting a better exit than the others.TeamKoolGreen wrote: ↑22 Feb 2026, 05:29How is the Mercedes works engine so much stronger out of the corners than the McLaren Mercedes ? And no, that isn't a difference in drag.dia6olo wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 18:11
Is this the one?
https://x.com/gurt___yo_ah/status/2024214245974360465
Would not be feasible I'd say ...