Audi R26

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
AR3-GP
560
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Audi R26

Post

I think that is the gearbox and rear end on the right.

Image
Beware of T-Rex

Brahmal
Brahmal
58
Joined: 19 Oct 2024, 05:07

Re: Audi R26

Post

Is that Binotto under the car?

User avatar
AR3-GP
560
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Audi R26

Post

Image
Beware of T-Rex

User avatar
AR3-GP
560
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Audi R26

Post

Nicolas Carpentiers from Melbourne

Image
Image
Image
Image
Beware of T-Rex

User avatar
AR3-GP
560
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Audi R26

Post

Beware of T-Rex

vorticism
vorticism
443
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20
Location: YooEssay

Re: Audi R26

Post

Hollow spokes there, just very wide spokes.

vorticism wrote:
10 Jan 2026, 02:39
Flat-faced wheel spokes.
Image
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

User avatar
AR3-GP
560
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Audi R26

Post

vorticism wrote:
11 Mar 2026, 00:07
Hollow spokes there, just very wide spokes.

vorticism wrote:
10 Jan 2026, 02:39
Flat-faced wheel spokes.
https://i.postimg.cc/LX5NW5m3/Screensho ... 0103-3.png
ah that's very clever.

Image
Beware of T-Rex

Farnborough
Farnborough
139
Joined: 18 Mar 2023, 14:15

Re: Audi R26

Post

Good detail of the split top "wishbone" as effectively two separate and simgular struts to form that arrangement.

Look at the outer end at the upright, see how far they are displaced vertically, one from the other, at that location.

Farnborough
Farnborough
139
Joined: 18 Mar 2023, 14:15

Re: Audi R26

Post

vorticism wrote:
11 Mar 2026, 00:07
Hollow spokes there, just very wide spokes.

vorticism wrote:
10 Jan 2026, 02:39
Flat-faced wheel spokes.
https://i.postimg.cc/LX5NW5m3/Screensho ... 0103-3.png
Clever design in concept certainly.

Effectively a "negative" image of how we conventionally think of spokes by flipping the thinking in this application.

User avatar
AR3-GP
560
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Audi R26

Post

Something that always fascinated me is how the steering linkage uses such a narrow connection to the inner ball joint of the steering rack. Perhaps the load isn't very high if the geometry is correct (no POU, no scrub radius, high leverage relative to kingpin).

Image
Beware of T-Rex

User avatar
Stu
Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2019, 10:05
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: Audi R26

Post

Farnborough wrote:
11 Mar 2026, 00:20
Good detail of the split top "wishbone" as effectively two separate and simgular struts to form that arrangement.

Look at the outer end at the upright, see how far they are displaced vertically, one from the other, at that location.
And having just seen the wreckage photo in the W17 thread (thank you AR3-GP 🙏), not a universal thing to do.
Although we think of multi-link designs as a new tech approach, it is more in line kinematically with the old 1950’s & 1960’s approach (separated control arms and links); the big difference is the vertical displacement, which does make visually examining the suspension behaviour near impossible (makes a mockery of the ‘loads of anti-xxxx there’ comments). I have it on very good authority that it very specialist software is required to analyse the kinematics of modern multi-link systems.
Perspective - Understanding that sometimes the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view.

Farnborough
Farnborough
139
Joined: 18 Mar 2023, 14:15

Re: Audi R26

Post

Stu wrote:
11 Mar 2026, 08:51
Farnborough wrote:
11 Mar 2026, 00:20
Good detail of the split top "wishbone" as effectively two separate and simgular struts to form that arrangement.

Look at the outer end at the upright, see how far they are displaced vertically, one from the other, at that location.
And having just seen the wreckage photo in the W17 thread (thank you AR3-GP 🙏), not a universal thing to do.
Although we think of multi-link designs as a new tech approach, it is more in line kinematically with the old 1950’s & 1960’s approach (separated control arms and links); the big difference is the vertical displacement, which does make visually examining the suspension behaviour near impossible (makes a mockery of the ‘loads of anti-xxxx there’ comments). I have it on very good authority that it very specialist software is required to analyse the kinematics of modern multi-link systems.
Its something that Audi themselves possess considerable experience around. Their A8 chassis birth brought this split top wishbone, not vertically but longitudinal in layout, to their car platform in early 1990s.
Essentially to deal with front driven wheel needs (Quattro & front drive iteration) dynamics by extremely detailed presentation of that tyre to road surface within constraint challenges.
It's a double "wisbone" installation with effectively separated "pushrod" spring and damper (without location duties) applied to near the base of upright location.
Ultimately, in that usage, it concisely controls the space in which the wheel moves very tightly through steering, while also bringing more advantageous control of contact tyre patch dynamics in presenting it to road surface.
That chassis was also multi link rear too. Folded into small space form with castor, camber and toe link independence in design.
They must possess significant knowledge and evaluation of such system as routine, plus James Key also advanced in this type thinking in previous chassis, going back to Toro Rosso concept that others copied.

User avatar
AR3-GP
560
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Audi R26

Post

Motorsport Italy says Audi is the only team running 8 piston brake caliper (4 piston per side).

Image
https://it.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-au ... /10804434/
Beware of T-Rex

Brahmal
Brahmal
58
Joined: 19 Oct 2024, 05:07

Re: Audi R26

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
12 Mar 2026, 20:44
Motorsport Italy says Audi is the only team running 8 piston brake caliper (4 piston per side).

https://it.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-au ... /10804434/
The article also says "four pads." So two pads per front brake?

User avatar
AR3-GP
560
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Audi R26

Post

Brahmal wrote:
12 Mar 2026, 21:20
AR3-GP wrote:
12 Mar 2026, 20:44
Motorsport Italy says Audi is the only team running 8 piston brake caliper (4 piston per side).

https://it.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-au ... /10804434/
The article also says "four pads." So two pads per front brake?
Four pads would mean two on each side of the brake caliper. To be clear, the 8 pistons are also distributed 4 per side of the caliper. So the front brake calipers (left and right) would have a total of 16 pistons, and 8 pads. Sounds a bit mad :lol:
Beware of T-Rex