maybe the work they done have in japan in synchronizations of gearbox and pu is working.you need good traction to be fast out of slow corners and for that you need good engine mapping.you cant separate the car from the engine.which show Newey was wrong at start to lumb all problems on honda.collindsilva wrote: ↑23 May 2026, 07:53Yes, Seems the chassis is good in slow corners, the engine is holding back. The sprint should shed more light on the race pace and order.
It was a wrong call to start the inhouse gearbox with the new engine, they should have started their own gearbox in 2025, this would have ironed out any issues ...OnEcRiTiCaL wrote: ↑23 May 2026, 09:41As you make a comparison in telemetry with Redbull, Mercedes, is clear that they gearbox gearing ratio just not right,to long.
the pu in 2025 is different from pu in 2026,so building a pu in 2025 would have meant that they only used it for one year then ditch it and start all over again for new set of regulation .thats is not a sound financial decisioncollindsilva wrote: ↑23 May 2026, 09:46It was a wrong call to start the inhouse gearbox with the new engine, they should have started their own gearbox in 2025, this would have ironed out any issues ...OnEcRiTiCaL wrote: ↑23 May 2026, 09:41As you make a comparison in telemetry with Redbull, Mercedes, is clear that they gearbox gearing ratio just not right,to long.
Right now it has become a year long testing for the engine and gearbox..
I was referring to Gearbox ...Bill wrote: ↑23 May 2026, 09:58the pu in 2025 is different from pu in 2026,so building a pu in 2025 would have meant that they only used it for one year then ditch it and start all over again for new set of regulation .thats is not a sound financial decisioncollindsilva wrote: ↑23 May 2026, 09:46It was a wrong call to start the inhouse gearbox with the new engine, they should have started their own gearbox in 2025, this would have ironed out any issues ...OnEcRiTiCaL wrote: ↑23 May 2026, 09:41As you make a comparison in telemetry with Redbull, Mercedes, is clear that they gearbox gearing ratio just not right,to long.
Right now it has become a year long testing for the engine and gearbox..
He probably is, yes. I couldn't care less, though. That comment is just plain wrong.diffuser wrote: ↑23 May 2026, 03:02My point is Ispano is probably Japanese.
This bad dynamic is going on with drivers, team managers and any other F1 related positionSedaxel wrote: ↑23 May 2026, 02:14Exactly.
And Alonso has nothing to prove. He can say whatever he wants as long as he is, race after race, proving the world class driver that he is.
I can't stand those comments from people who doesn't respect that.
Lastly is Vasseur, Alonso, Hulkenberg, Toto, ...DJ Downforce wrote: ↑23 May 2026, 12:15The pile on to the guy who was critical of Alonso's comments is pretty shocking. Cult like behaviour occurring here..
you built a gearbox for a specific engine with its own torque demand ,you cant take a gearbox from v8 era and put it on those v6 pu of late it will simply breakapart.today gearbox has to work with larger kers unit so its different from last year gearbox.collindsilva wrote: ↑23 May 2026, 10:01I was referring to Gearbox ...Bill wrote: ↑23 May 2026, 09:58the pu in 2025 is different from pu in 2026,so building a pu in 2025 would have meant that they only used it for one year then ditch it and start all over again for new set of regulation .thats is not a sound financial decisioncollindsilva wrote: ↑23 May 2026, 09:46
It was a wrong call to start the inhouse gearbox with the new engine, they should have started their own gearbox in 2025, this would have ironed out any issues ...
Right now it has become a year long testing for the engine and gearbox..