At Least they should have gone with split strategy, interns on 1 and soft on other, why would u put both your driver on similar tyre in such a conditions ..mzso wrote: ↑25 May 2026, 11:32Jeez. The McLaren strategy department is in full Ferrari mode still. I though signing Will Courtenay would improve things...
By the way it was interesting what they talked about in the cooldown room. That it's "not that hard" to follow yet, but the cars become very unstable when close behind.
The qualifying and first stint showed the cars to be pretty equal. In the last stint Hamilton was plain better at maintaining tyre temperatures. In a car with much less HP than the RBPT, impressive.avantman wrote: ↑25 May 2026, 08:47On that straight he was probably more like 100+ hp up and of course Verstappen had no battery to defend with on that straight. The move was completed in the straight line, not even in the corner.DJ Downforce wrote: ↑25 May 2026, 02:30Hamilton definitely surged past Verstappen with a pu 30hp down on the RBPT![]()
Russel goes off track at turn 10, gets overtaken in that corner and then he is ahead by the next corner???venkyhere wrote: ↑25 May 2026, 01:01We didn't see much yo-yo 'within one lap' because of the track layout where there is really only one long straight. And the reason for yo-yo between the mercs in the first quarter of the race, was because once every 2/3 laps, one of them would get their T10 braking wrong, due to the low grip from overnight/morning rain. We didn't see much yo-yo, not because the regulation changes solved it, it was because the layout of the track gave enough 'can't pass, but can recharge' opportunity between T1 and T10.
Ferrari had the better car here. Lewis screwed up his final run in Q3, should be been on second row. And because his earlier mistake in the first stint he had to make up a 7 second gap to Max. It was closer than it should be been.DJ Downforce wrote: ↑25 May 2026, 11:40The qualifying and first stint showed the cars to be pretty equal. In the last stint Hamilton was plain better at maintaining tyre temperatures. In a car with much less HP than the RBPT, impressive.avantman wrote: ↑25 May 2026, 08:47On that straight he was probably more like 100+ hp up and of course Verstappen had no battery to defend with on that straight. The move was completed in the straight line, not even in the corner.DJ Downforce wrote: ↑25 May 2026, 02:30
Hamilton definitely surged past Verstappen with a pu 30hp down on the RBPT![]()
1) on his final q3 lap the SM mode failed to enable so not his faultAesop wrote: ↑25 May 2026, 11:52Ferrari had the better car here. Lewis screwed up his final run in Q3, should be been on second row. And because his earlier mistake in the first stint he had to make up a 7 second gap to Max. It was closer than it should be been.DJ Downforce wrote: ↑25 May 2026, 11:40The qualifying and first stint showed the cars to be pretty equal. In the last stint Hamilton was plain better at maintaining tyre temperatures. In a car with much less HP than the RBPT, impressive.
no, everyone complained, it was truly horrific. Worst ever imho. Maybe they outsourced the production to AI, (very)low-IQ-Aliens or friends and family.mzso wrote: ↑25 May 2026, 11:43Am I the only one thinking the broadcast quality dreadful? Kept missing action, and some of them only got replayed in miniature. We get a mystical VSC with no info shown on why it happened. Hadjar served a stop/go, but the reason was not given, we could only assume it was from whatever yellow flag violation, that was never shown. The shown something in miniature on the right side that covered up the action, etc... There was a whole bunch of stuff.
The broadcast director from that race last year where they kept showing girlfriends' close-up shots instead of track action, was better than this broadcast director. Never seen such pathetic editing. "Dreadful" is the word.FrukostScones wrote: ↑25 May 2026, 14:39no, everyone complained, it was truly horrific. Worst ever imho. Maybe they outsourced the production to AI, (very)low-IQ-Aliens or friends and family.mzso wrote: ↑25 May 2026, 11:43Am I the only one thinking the broadcast quality dreadful? Kept missing action, and some of them only got replayed in miniature. We get a mystical VSC with no info shown on why it happened. Hadjar served a stop/go, but the reason was not given, we could only assume it was from whatever yellow flag violation, that was never shown. The shown something in miniature on the right side that covered up the action, etc... There was a whole bunch of stuff.

They are both flattered by an excellent, utterly dominant car. GR is yet to demonstrate championship caliber consistency in tyre management and race pace.avantman wrote: ↑25 May 2026, 12:54Mercedes Duel in Montreal - A thriller Until Lap 30 | 13 full onboard laps w/ radio
https://youtu.be/kns-wRGi35Y?si=1UZ6cobyJfwfq5xw
That was far far lesser quality battle than I initially thought. All overtaking looksd still horrible and mario kart. Even big mistakes made by both drivers weren't forced, all completely unforced. Russell going off track to defend the position in the final chicane lap 24. This is why he was under investigation. Not as bad as blatant as Max vs Ham in Brazil in 2021 but in essence exactly the same violation.
Looking up laptime data sheets, the ultimate winner lost around 8-10 seconds of race time during that fight with teammate, making those mistakes and switching positions. After Russell retirement he was obviously cruising whereas drivers behind pushing flatout (yes, this still happens in F1 at times). Once again our championship leader won a one- horse race, well done. !![]()
…Than Ferrari and Red bull, we can not say the same about Mclaren yet, can we?. Would be interesting to see Merc real pace next to Norris in a normal Canadian race - the only driver-car combo that was capable of challenging them or at least come anywhere near with some extra luck, as we saw both in Miami and Canada sprint. Red bull and Ferrari have zero chance even with all the luck.AR3-GP wrote: ↑25 May 2026, 18:32https://i.postimg.cc/DfDymGK8/image.png
Mercedes are in a completely different universe.
Mclarens had no chance. At the start of the sprint, the Mercs were half a second a lap quicker than Lando while having 6 lap old mediums when Lando had new ones.avantman wrote: ↑25 May 2026, 19:36…Than Ferrari and Red bull, we can not say the same about Mclaren yet, can we?. Would be interesting to see Merc real pace next to Norris in a normal Canadian race - the only driver-car combo that was capable of challenging them or at least come anywhere near with some extra luck, as we saw both in Miami and Canada sprint. Red bull and Ferrari have zero chance even with all the luck.AR3-GP wrote: ↑25 May 2026, 18:32https://i.postimg.cc/DfDymGK8/image.png
Mercedes are in a completely different universe.
Too bad mclaren did their best to prevent Lando from defending his title, as he was the only one capable of making this season somewhat remotely exciting, providing Mclaren next updates work. After Canada he officially has no chance given the points gap. This now feels like 2014 all over again, but with lower quality drivers in Mercedes cockpits.
