There would be no logic granting the team with the best ICE further development either, according to your methodology.AR3-GP wrote: ↑08 Jun 2026, 03:29Because ADUO should be implemented for the entire PU including the Hybrid. Otherwise why should there be a measurement process for the ICE which grants additional development items for the Hybrid system. That is what the current system does. So the Mercedes class leading hybrid system is now allowed to get further ahead, while Red Bull are actually blocked from improving their hybrid system until 2028 according to the regulations, simply because of the ICE rating. This has no logic.
https://i.postimg.cc/ryvg39xb/image.png
https://i.postimg.cc/fRWdr3qm/image.png
You can see now that this is not a PU catchup mechanism like Toto Wolff requested. This scheme will allow Mercedes to increase their PU margin.
I think we have some middle ground on the notion of open development for all but I think we enter the realm of assumptions when we say “X manufacturer has the best overall PU.” All these claims are coming from journalists or drivers. The same ones who say things like Ferrari have the best chassis. What would RB look like on the straights without an overweight pig of a car with terrible aero efficiency?
Clearly, the RBPT ICE is most powerful per the FIA’s measurement so kudos to them for topping Mercedes and Ferrari out of the gate.
I’m now going to red flag myself and suggest that any further ADUO discussion be confined to a thread narrowly tailored for the topic, as to not take this one any further off topic.

