diffuser wrote: ↑02 Aug 2026, 17:01
etusch wrote: ↑02 Aug 2026, 08:20
diffuser wrote: ↑
I don't understand the graphic, like for AMR 8th gear is 92%, what does that mean?
It considers the lowest ratio to be 100/100 and tells you the proportional difference between longer and shorter ratios. So, Aıdi has the shortest first gear, it is 100%, while the Red Bull's first gear is 94% longer, for example.
I think Aston and Honda considered acceleration in all gears as a common feature of both ice and em, and perhaps planned for more intensive em use in the longer gears.
That's kind of weird way of looking at it but I see what you're saying. RBR 1st gear is 6% longer. So if audi hits 11k in 1st gear at 40kph, RBR would do the same at 40 *1.06=42.4kph.
I've noticed that Alonso often doesn't use 8th gear. 8th gear on the AMR F1 is useless unless you have battery. The ICE can't accelerate in 8th gear alone. Too often in the earlier races he didn't have battery charge down the straights or in Miami he was saving it to use somewhere else. The result was red lining down the straight in 7th.
If they can reach the rev limit in 7th gear, it means they can do something in 8th as well.
We need to look at the purpose of the concept here, because the only thing we know for sure is that they didn't achieve to do what they wanted and are now fixing things. So saying "it wasn't working" is even stranger, because they're behind precisely because they didn't get what they wanted. Also, they might have included 8th gear not because they needed it, but because of the rules.
Ultimately, the speed difference with other teams could probably be achieved in 7th gear if they could rev the engine a bit more. Also, reaching a certain speed earlier but staying at a lower maximum speed is a concept. The only drawback is overtaking. Example from motogp, Ducati’s main concept is having best acceleration not top speed. And they are very good at it. When they put a gap after a turn you should vlose that gap first