Yeah, I agree. I think the engine is the weakest part of this car. And also think that, until the engine is at least close to the others, We won't know what the real performance of the chassis is.
So, how draggy do you think the AMR is, compared to the others, of course.
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/what- ... hatgpt.comhollus wrote: ↑05 Sep 2026, 16:27So, how draggy do you think the AMR is, compared to the others, of course.
I'd wager that the lack of top end speed is likely 25% extra drag, 75% missing power (remember, drag consumes extra power as a cubic law so its (delta) effect in top speed feels kind of tripled (as 1.01 cubed is 1.0303). But again, I - don't - know.
I don't think you know, so don't be so fast to dismiss other's points.
What - do - you - THINK?
Mmmm...diffuser wrote: ↑05 Sep 2026, 17:00https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/what- ... hatgpt.comhollus wrote: ↑05 Sep 2026, 16:27So, how draggy do you think the AMR is, compared to the others, of course.
I'd wager that the lack of top end speed is likely 25% extra drag, 75% missing power (remember, drag consumes extra power as a cubic law so its (delta) effect in top speed feels kind of tripled (as 1.01 cubed is 1.0303). But again, I - don't - know.
I don't think you know, so don't be so fast to dismiss other's points.
What - do - you - THINK?
Shintaro Orihara "Our engine performance is definitely poor compared to other manufacturers. So probably the most important point to improve now is our engine performance because, as I mentioned, the gap is quite huge.
I see no reason to believe that the AMR26 is any more that 1 or 2 % better or worse draggy that other cars.
What do you think? AM´s car is better than Alpine´s but the engine deficit is HUGE. As I said before, try to work out a deal with Red Bull, ffs
I've already criticized your mindset. Trying to find a valid reason for it would be more useful than repeating the same thing over and over. According to you, the car is very good, but it's not at the front because of the PU. (We experienced the same thing during the McLaren era. Then it turned out the car wasn't the best, and those who claimed their car was the best ended up ruining the team. Unfortunately, many names from that time have come together again in this same vein.)Sedaxel wrote: ↑05 Sep 2026, 13:13Honda is NOT the only one to blame for the whole deficit.HondaPOD wrote: ↑05 Sep 2026, 12:31The AMR26 isn’t only a draggy car, it’s also a heavy car. that combination is particularly punishing at Monza.
The weight penalty is not 0.3 s per 10 kg anymore. As James Vowles has pointed out, a car overweight can cost more than the traditional 0.3s. probably 0.5s per 10kg.
But we can continue to blame honda for the whole deficit.
Honda is the one to blame for the major part of the deficit right now.
We all want Honda to succeed and to bring a "normal" motor. Not asking for the best... Just a normal one. Currently, it's clearly the worst engine of the grid.
So apart from pointing out things as they are, let's give Honda the chance to improve their work. And to improve, neglecting the evidence doesn't help at all.
My post was sarcasm towards those who blamed the car instead of the engine for the deficit.Artur Craft wrote: ↑05 Sep 2026, 17:14What do you think? AM´s car is better than Alpine´s but the engine deficit is HUGE. As I said before, try to work out a deal with Red Bull, ffs