sorry, yes that's what I meant.
sorry, yes that's what I meant.
I reread the article back in May from The Race, and the deal is not as good as it seems. The rules are very confusing, and 8 million of the so-called 19 million extra allowance has to be paid back against its engine cost cap in future seasons. Any gains that Honda makes during the off-season will harm its ability to catch-up in future seasons with a more constricted budget. No wonder Alonso is not interested in signing on for two more years if the status quo remains.
Well in that video "the race" say Honda IS getting 19M. It's not a maybe or could, THEY ARE GETTING!TyreSlip wrote: ↑12 Sep 2026, 22:51I reread the article back in May from The Race, and the deal is not as good as it seems. The rules are very confusing, and 8 million of the so-called 19 million extra allowance has to be paid back against its engine cost cap in future seasons. Any gains that Honda makes during the off-season will harm its ability to catch-up in future seasons with a more constricted budget. No wonder Alonso is not interested in signing on for two more years if the status quo remains.
This seems like a semantics issue. They are getting 19 million for now, but not without a cost.diffuser wrote: ↑12 Sep 2026, 23:53Well in that video "the race" say Honda IS getting 19M. It's not a maybe or could, THEY ARE GETTING!TyreSlip wrote: ↑12 Sep 2026, 22:51I reread the article back in May from The Race, and the deal is not as good as it seems. The rules are very confusing, and 8 million of the so-called 19 million extra allowance has to be paid back against its engine cost cap in future seasons. Any gains that Honda makes during the off-season will harm its ability to catch-up in future seasons with a more constricted budget. No wonder Alonso is not interested in signing on for two more years if the status quo remains.
Newey said they wanted Honda to focus solely on 2027 and forget this year's design. Spec 2, whether or not we consider it a noticeable upgrade, was a bonus.
Well the more appropriate way of saying it is that they'll be allowed to spend 19 million more than the CAP allows, where 8 comes out of future CAPs.TyreSlip wrote: ↑12 Sep 2026, 23:59This seems like a semantics issue. They are getting 19 million for now, but not without a cost.diffuser wrote: ↑12 Sep 2026, 23:53Well in that video "the race" say Honda IS getting 19M. It's not a maybe or could, THEY ARE GETTING!TyreSlip wrote: ↑12 Sep 2026, 22:51
I reread the article back in May from The Race, and the deal is not as good as it seems. The rules are very confusing, and 8 million of the so-called 19 million extra allowance has to be paid back against its engine cost cap in future seasons. Any gains that Honda makes during the off-season will harm its ability to catch-up in future seasons with a more constricted budget. No wonder Alonso is not interested in signing on for two more years if the status quo remains.
https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/how- ... ally-work/
Which is a huge problem. Honda is not going to magically have the best engine in a year, and meanwhile, they are handicapped with development for future seasons. This must change, otherwise, what is the point of Honda staying?diffuser wrote: ↑13 Sep 2026, 00:26Well the more appropriate way of saying it is that they'll be allowed to spend 19 million more than the CAP allows, where 8 comes out of future CAPs.TyreSlip wrote: ↑12 Sep 2026, 23:59This seems like a semantics issue. They are getting 19 million for now, but not without a cost.
https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/how- ... ally-work/
Well, it's a HUGE problem now... I can't see how it can get worse....We don't know if it will be a huge problem in 2028. I mean if they fail, ADUO might add 11 million or more to their CAP in 2028.TyreSlip wrote: ↑13 Sep 2026, 00:32Which is a huge problem. Honda is not going to magically have the best engine in a year, and meanwhile, they are handicapped with development for future seasons. This must change, otherwise, what is the point of Honda staying?diffuser wrote: ↑13 Sep 2026, 00:26Well the more appropriate way of saying it is that they'll be allowed to spend 19 million more than the CAP allows, where 8 comes out of future CAPs.TyreSlip wrote: ↑12 Sep 2026, 23:59
This seems like a semantics issue. They are getting 19 million for now, but not without a cost.
https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/how- ... ally-work/
I wrote about this. My guess was, FP3 you're allowed 9MJ of recharge while in quali at Madrid it's 7.5MJ. So they just ran out of energy in S3. Quali kind of sucks cause when you lower the recharge per lap at a track like Madrid, it amplifies the weakness of the ICE.
It looks like Honda opened up the power a bit, the telemetry data showed for the first time it might have the promised 30bhp upgrade running (which ultimately broke stroll water pump and also even with the 30bhp upgrade, they still 30 of Audi and 60 bhp off Ferrari with ADUO 2 (forget Mercedes)).