Source: http://www.jamesallenonf1.com/2010/01/t ... and-lopez/James Allen wrote:...The following day Massa put the performance in context when he went almost three seconds faster, setting a time in the 1m 18s...
How in the world would you conclude that from what Ringo said?Pandamasque wrote:I hope you're not suggesting that MS is about to step away to GP2 to leave his ride for the Doctor?ringo wrote:Shumacher's GP2 test was similarly lengthy because the car was being evaluated. Rossi's test was supposed to be a gift, or joy ride, strangely it was a pretty intense for an exhibition.
Maybe there was some evaluation going on, who knows?
Nothing exactly new.Astro1 wrote:Looks like will be stuck with seeing the photos Ferrari provide on their site. Apparently photographers are not allowed.
http://ferrarif1forum.com/2010/01/26/ph ... ri-launch/
Ferrari witheld the Rossi vs Massa times in order to generate buzz, attract attention, and mislead fans into believing Rossi was a suitable prospect for Ferrari.Main Entry: propaganda
Part of Speech: noun
Definition: information that is designed to mislead or persuade
From wikipedia:DaveKillens wrote:Ferrari witheld the Rossi vs Massa times in order to generate buzz, attract attention, and mislead fans into believing Rossi was a suitable prospect for Ferrari.Main Entry: propaganda
Part of Speech: noun
Definition: information that is designed to mislead or persuade
Obviously the event that will be held tomorrow is closely controlled by Ferrari, and it will be to showcase their new car, and put out more propaganda. Of course, the car presented tomorrow will bear little resemblance to the final product that shows up at Bahrain in March.
...
power ranger boots???raceman wrote:mx_tifosi wrote:
Too much white.
Yuppers, did my own piece of propaganda by displaying only one side of the argument, and my perception of the situation. That was the point I was trying to make, and what better way than to perform some "propaganda"?See what you just did there?
Anyways, I don't want to get into a pissing contest, your observation was valid. But I do wish this wasn't about me, but instead the topic at hand, you know, the Ferrari. Andartop, although I respect you, I will not engage any further in an exercise where combatants believe they can form a valid argument by picking apart the comments of the opposing viewpoint.See what you just did there?
Yeah, can't get thereraceman wrote:as expected, Ferrari web site is damn slow just to show the homepage![]()
if anyone has got it through, just can post some print-screen photos pls?