http://www.autosport.com/gallery/photo.php/id/1324340
The little exhaust holes underneath the sidepod... You can also see how high the intakes are.
There are also three little holes beside the cockpit.
I think all those cooling gills were in the 2009 car... (or was it Williams?)outer_bongolia wrote:http://www.autosport.com/gallery/photo.php/id/1324340
The little exhaust holes underneath the sidepod... You can also see how high the intakes are.
There are also three little holes beside the cockpit.
@EspimperiumPersonally i think that Sauber have shot themselvs in the foot a little, missing a glitering opertunity to have brand exposure for a minimal outlay in comparison. But handing over the risk element to another third party.
I'd say the small miracle is actually the binding Concorde Agreement that has forced the name to remain.Raptor22 wrote:I don't think BMW wants the technical association. They allowed their name to remain with the team for 2010 for revenue payout purposes. This is as far as their goodwill goes.
..Its a small miracle that the BMW name is allowed to stay with the team for 2010.
Fil wrote:I'd say the small miracle is actually the binding Concorde Agreement that has forced the name to remain.Raptor22 wrote:I don't think BMW wants the technical association. They allowed their name to remain with the team for 2010 for revenue payout purposes. This is as far as their goodwill goes.
..Its a small miracle that the BMW name is allowed to stay with the team for 2010.
I'm sure if it were up to BMW, their name would not be associated with the team in any way but for history's pages.
It was bonded only if the name remained unchanged. The penalty for exit was only introduced once the new agreement was signed so BMW could have walked scot free and Sauber would have to rebrand, loosing out on the TV revenues.Fil wrote:Agreed, but 2009 TV rights & Constructor cash (which this is all about) was bound by the previous Concorde signing though.
The new one starts as of this season.
imightbewrong wrote:
Is it raining/damp in valencia? Why the intermediates?ESPImperium wrote:
MattyT wrote:Is it raining/damp in valencia? Why the intermediates?ESPImperium wrote:
Cool, thanks.meves wrote:It'll be an installation lap, they won't use slicks for that.