autogyro wrote:Giblet wrote:If they called it a Ferrari with KERS, and it was there as a power aid, would that be OK? Boost on demand?
Some people with lots of money have lots of money because they know how to not spend lots of money.
If you had a Ferrari, that was as fast as a regular one but it had a battery and motor assist for power or economy, then maybe that would be a good Ferrari to win races as the "Cannonball Run" or whatever the real version is called. Stop less, better chance of winning.
LeMans?
I don't think it is an idea to immediately poopoo, unless you are such a purist it desrves no second look.
Ferrari has made some flops in the past, this could be one of them.
You have just got to laugh.
Ferrari kills Kers in F1 and then tries to justify a green image with this thing.
A couple of electric motors and a great big ic engine that changes 8 mpg to 12 mpg.
Wow give them a big prize for bull sh--.
You are focusing on just MPG, and as far as I remember, KERS initial implementation had nothing to do with MPG, it has all to do with performance.
80hp on demand, possibly more, or for longer than the F1 KERS allowed sounds great to me. So I get a Ferrari engine, add 30-60kg, and now I have electtric boost at the push of a button?
I am trying to figure out what this would take away from a Ferrari.
All I can find is is a leaked image, with text we can't read, showing a small lump beside the engine.
Purists argued against the F40 when it came out, with it's turbocharging. Turned out to be one of the best and most loved Ferraris of all time.
OF ALL TIME!!!
(Go away Kanye)