There are plenty of quotes by Ross Brawn to that effect. http://www.autoracingdaily.com/news/for ... ss-brawn1/ In this one he mentioned an employment level of 450 in January 2010.Pierce89 wrote:We would all like a source on the claim that MGP are running under next years RRA rules. I can't see a team of that level tying one arm behind their back.JohnsonEvilTwin wrote: I was not aware that Mercedes GP are currently running under NEXT YEARS resource restriction rules.
Less Manpower will obviously have an adverse effect in getting updates ready especially as big as the one mooted for Barcelona.
Sure he doesdoopie2you wrote: So my question is, does Ross know something we don't know?
If you dont have the source please do not post as you may be telling it wrong thank youWhiteBlue wrote:There are plenty of quotes by Ross Brawn to that effect. http://www.autoracingdaily.com/news/for ... ss-brawn1/ In this one he mentioned an employment level of 450 in January 2010.Pierce89 wrote:We would all like a source on the claim that MGP are running under next years RRA rules. I can't see a team of that level tying one arm behind their back.JohnsonEvilTwin wrote: I was not aware that Mercedes GP are currently running under NEXT YEARS resource restriction rules.
Less Manpower will obviously have an adverse effect in getting updates ready especially as big as the one mooted for Barcelona.
At the same time Domenicali quoted 850 team members for Ferrari. I don't have the primary source but our member donscar quoted from GP.com. viewtopic.php?p=140616#p140616
In the same thread we found evidence that the head count cap will probably be 350 in 2011 and 280 in 2012. The amount of bought in external work is limited to 20 mil $ but that is also being reduced on a sliding scale. So nobody knows exactly which figure will apply when.
Please care to read the first source I gave you for the Merc head count. You are extremely rude to let other people do the leg work for you and then reject their effort. The references for the 2011 head count cap are also in the thread I gave you with the second source. For the lazy folks who can't read I give them once again explicitly.adam2007 wrote:If you dont have the source please do not post as you may be telling it wrong thank youWhiteBlue wrote:There are plenty of quotes by Ross Brawn to that effect. http://www.autoracingdaily.com/news/for ... ss-brawn1/ In this one he mentioned an employment level of 450 in January 2010.Pierce89 wrote:We would all like a source on the claim that MGP are running under next years RRA rules. I can't see a team of that level tying one arm behind their back.
At the same time Domenicali quoted 850 team members for Ferrari. I don't have the primary source but our member donscar quoted from GP.com. viewtopic.php?p=140616#p140616
In the same thread we found evidence that the head count cap will probably be 350 in 2011 and 280 in 2012. The amount of bought in external work is limited to 20 mil $ but that is also being reduced on a sliding scale. So nobody knows exactly which figure will apply when.
Regardless 450 is not 350 or 280. So MGP is not running under next years RRA rules, and the team went to 450 last year(as BGP) because Brawn couldn't afford 700 heads.http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/74128Nick Fry mentions it when asked if they can push for the championship.WhiteBlue wrote:There are plenty of quotes by Ross Brawn to that effect. http://www.autoracingdaily.com/news/for ... ss-brawn1/ In this one he mentioned an employment level of 450 in January 2010.Pierce89 wrote:We would all like a source on the claim that MGP are running under next years RRA rules. I can't see a team of that level tying one arm behind their back.JohnsonEvilTwin wrote: I was not aware that Mercedes GP are currently running under NEXT YEARS resource restriction rules.
Less Manpower will obviously have an adverse effect in getting updates ready especially as big as the one mooted for Barcelona.
At the same time Domenicali quoted 850 team members for Ferrari. I don't have the primary source but our member donscar quoted from GP.com. viewtopic.php?p=140616#p140616
In the same thread we found evidence that the head count cap will probably be 350 in 2011 and 280 in 2012. The amount of bought in external work is limited to 20 mil $ but that is also being reduced on a sliding scale. So nobody knows exactly which figure will apply when.
I doubt this would be allowed ...on which grounds and just why should they?ESPImperium wrote:Firstly, can this be merged with the W01 main thread???
Secondly, i do belive that Mercedes will come up with a new chassis at Barcelona, for the reason of "relyability" and or "Saftey" issues. More or less to the same way that Virgin have a new chassis coming for their larger fuel tank, but that is semingly not as big as maybe is to be belived.
The thing is that if they do, you can put in a F-Duct, but id not expect that from them. Maybes a lighter chassis, and one with some charicteristic changes to the current three (W01-01, W01-02 and W01-03) chassis that are in existance.
as stated before ..moving ballast is far more effective for moving CG longitudinally than elongating wb.you could of course do a lot by changing layout of the wishbones in front with no impact on the tub itself.ringo wrote:Is new chassis really needed? Remember the engine and transmission are load bearing structures.
Everything basically hangs off these parts. All virgin will do is move the engine and gear box back. I don't know what they will fit between it to make more space, but the floor and other body panels just have to be elongated then hung off the load bearing structures and that's it. Wheels and wing ect. will follow suit with the gearbox, no major adjustment.
I am not sure about how exactly load bearing parts are fitted to the tub, but the tub itself may be ok as long as some means of putting space between it and the engine is used. Maybe an adaption plate or something?
I want to see what Merc will do to change their car. I suspect wheel base changes will be the most drastic. There may be little tricks they can use to get away with not changing the tub.
I think it's a bit nit picking to point to a deviation of 100 heads when Ferrari or McLaren have an excess of 500. Just add the word substantially and the statement is true. If you compete with an opponent who has almost twice your resources wouldn't you say that you compete with one arm tied behind your back?Pierce89 wrote:Regardless 450 is not 350 or 280. So MGP is not running under next years RRA rules, and the team went to 450 last year(as BGP) because Brawn couldn't afford 700 heads.http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/74128Nick Fry mentions it when asked if they can push for the championship.WhiteBlue wrote:There are plenty of quotes by Ross Brawn to that effect. http://www.autoracingdaily.com/news/for ... ss-brawn1/ In this one he mentioned an employment level of 450 in January 2010.Pierce89 wrote:We would all like a source on the claim that MGP are running under next years RRA rules. I can't see a team of that level tying one arm behind their back.
At the same time Domenicali quoted 850 team members for Ferrari. I don't have the primary source but our member donscar quoted from GP.com. viewtopic.php?p=140616#p140616
In the same thread we found evidence that the head count cap will probably be 350 in 2011 and 280 in 2012. The amount of bought in external work is limited to 20 mil $ but that is also being reduced on a sliding scale. So nobody knows exactly which figure will apply when.