HRT F111 Cosworth

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
Hangaku
0
Joined: 20 Apr 2009, 16:38
Location: Manchester, UK

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

As far as I'm aware, homologation just means to "agree" on something, so something cannot be homolgated unless it's passed it's crash testing. This means that HRT might have the ability to correct their new front wing, and then get it homologated. Seems only fair to me.
Yer.

User avatar
ecapox
8
Joined: 14 May 2010, 21:06

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

Good thing that F1 is the "Pinnacle of Motorsports". Maybe HRT is doing this on purpose. Maybe they really DO have 2 cars ready and are just pretending to be a garbage team that isnt even up to GP2 standards. Maybe.

2011 Predictions for HRT.

-Will not get 2 cars for Quali 1
-Will not take part in race due to 107% rule
-Will not race after Australia

=D>

bjpower
bjpower
-1
Joined: 17 May 2009, 14:26

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

any chance of rain for quali?

cbbcisace
cbbcisace
0
Joined: 17 Jan 2011, 00:31

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

It would help Hispania alot........

User avatar
747heavy
24
Joined: 06 Jul 2010, 21:45

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

just seeing the tire blankets in the photo of the HRT.
What´s the situation here? Was theer not talk to ban them for cost reasons?
I know that it was meaned to be last year allready, but Bridgestone and the teams objected for safety reasons.
Now with a new supplier, it would have been a good time to make the switch.
Anyone can bring me up to speed, as what the current situation is?

Some stated, that the "homologation" of the chassis/tub was scraped for this year ( dunno if this is the case or not), but if it´s the case, it would be "strange" to still have a "homologated" nose cone (for cost reasons) - IMHO

AFAIK it´s the nose cone, that´s subject to the crash test, not the wing as such.
But it´s conceivable, that the new front wing is designed around a specific nose cone (shape).
"Make the suspension adjustable and they will adjust it wrong ......
look what they can do to a carburetor in just a few moments of stupidity with a screwdriver."
- Colin Chapman

“Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.” - Leonardo da Vinci

User avatar
ringo
230
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

It wouldn't be allowed on the track if it didn't comply fully with the safety tests. So they are ok i think.
For Sure!!

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

Ringo, the whole point is that HRT seem to have a new and old front wing. We saw the new one at the launch, and we see the 2010 (old) wing here. SO the 2011 one hasn't taken the track yet
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
64
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 00:08
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

So, the questions on the front wing shall be answered;

1] Has the nose box failed crash tests? A: that is strictly confidential, but im sure a reporter could get it out of someone. It is possible the new nose box is failing crash tests and the old one still complies.
2] Has the wing failed homologation? A: Front and Rear wings don't have homologation or crash tests, but have Load Tests in scrutineering, don't they???
3] Why have they used the old front wing? A: Validation, wouldn't you want to baseline against a known value than a unknown???

Its not the first time that a cars nosebox has been right down to the last few hours before they were bolted on to the car, Red Bull with the RB3 was failing crash tests right up to 3 hours before Quali in 2007 for rear impact structures. Same team a year on couldn't get the nosebox certificate through until 53 minutes before Quali at Aus 2008. It was that tight for them. Spyker failed their crash tests for the F8-VIIB in 2008 and had to wait for 2 more GPs to get Sutil onto a B Spec for Belgium.

Its nothing to be worried about for Hispania, other better off teams have been through worse.

User avatar
ecapox
8
Joined: 14 May 2010, 21:06

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

ESPImperium wrote:Its nothing to be worried about for Hispania, other better off teams have been through worse.
The filing of the crash tests is nothing to be worried about, or in general HRT is nothing to be worried about?

I'd agree that the crash tests is no big issue, but the team in general has serious issues.

bill shoe
bill shoe
151
Joined: 19 Nov 2008, 08:18
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

Obviously not a good start for HRT. Race participation is precarious.

On a positive note they did complete more running than Karun Chandhok.

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
64
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 00:08
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

I have a feeling that Hispania will be either taken over or be gone mid season now.

I really hope im wrong, but its not looking good ill admit.

Im really hoping their plan for the rest of the event is for FP3 to be the shakedown, get Q1 out of the way and get in the 107% rule and then for the race, get both guys doing a test programme each.

If they get to Turkey with 5,000km on the clock i think they will be in better shape in Spain when they have their first ever proper update.

donskar
donskar
2
Joined: 03 Feb 2007, 16:41
Location: Cardboard box, end of Boulevard of Broken Dreams

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

Enough of this conjecture. Here is the straight poop:

USGP has NOT disbanded. They have merely changed their name to HRT. We can now see the result of USGP throwing their full technical and financial weight into this new effort.

Seriously, this is beginning to look like a real disgrace. (I hope to be proven wrong.)
Last edited by donskar on 25 Mar 2011, 22:08, edited 1 time in total.
Enzo Ferrari was a great man. But he was not a good man. -- Phil Hill

User avatar
ecapox
8
Joined: 14 May 2010, 21:06

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

I think we all want them to stay around. More cars the better. Unfortunately things are looking bleak.

There is a reason the have no sponsors. Who would want to sponsor that? The cars do get a lot of tv time but that is when the catch on fire, crash, or are sitting in the garage.

Lets be realistic though. Of the 3 new teams, two are at least decent. You can argue their quality but at least they have their cars running. And in reality, 2 out of 3 new teams being decent is good.

donskar
donskar
2
Joined: 03 Feb 2007, 16:41
Location: Cardboard box, end of Boulevard of Broken Dreams

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

ecapox wrote:I think we all want them to stay around. More cars the better. Unfortunately things are looking bleak.

There is a reason the have no sponsors. Who would want to sponsor that? The cars do get a lot of tv time but that is when the catch on fire, crash, or are sitting in the garage.

Lets be realistic though. Of the 3 new teams, two are at least decent. You can argue their quality but at least they have their cars running. And in reality, 2 out of 3 new teams being decent is good.
Agree: 2 out of 3 is a reasonable definition of success, BUT Vurgin is 6+ seconds off the pace so far. . . Let's hope they find a big improvement in pace.
Enzo Ferrari was a great man. But he was not a good man. -- Phil Hill

cbbcisace
cbbcisace
0
Joined: 17 Jan 2011, 00:31

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

I don't think Hispania will take long to get to reasonable level tomorrow.

The Virgin seems quite a dog to drive...