HRT F111 Cosworth

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Owen.C93
Owen.C93
177
Joined: 24 Jul 2010, 17:52

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

At least they don't have any sponsors to upset ;)

I expect their pace to improve once they get their 2011 wing back.
Motorsport Graduate in search of team experience ;)

wesley123
wesley123
204
Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 17:55

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

sure their pace improves, but not by 2.5 seconds by a simple front wing.
"Bite my shiny metal ass" - Bender

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
64
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 00:08
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

747heavy wrote:But it´s good to see the 107% rule back IMHO, to keep people honest.

I don´t like the idea a team being able to show up with a --- car X sec. off the pace, and run the team as a profit centre, by selling seat time to pay drivers.

I know, it´s not feasable with the current regs, but otherwise I would be in favour of a football/soccer like promotion system.
Giving the best (or best two) GP2 teams a slot in F1 and relegate the worse two F1 teams back to GP2 (or whatever you want to call the series).
That would keep everybody on there toes and motivated to perform.
Personally, after doing the timing data for my first race data sheet (on my PC and not my MacBook [which im using for this reply]) id like to see the 107% rule made into a sweating platform for all the cars knocked out of Q1, as this way Virgin would also be knocked out, meaning that cars would have to be a mile faster than they are at present.

As for a Promotion/Relegation, this is where id like to see the GP2/11 brought in, it means that you can be on the pace, without too much trouble and expense. BUT only for a set period of time, if a team can get through 2 seasons and use itself as a profit centre, it can then afford to develop its first full chassis. But by then id say that team may have been relegated.

I have always ben a fan of customer cars, but id make it that teams can only buy IP Licences from teams that didn't finish in the top 5 of the constructors table 2 years present, but they cannot buy readily made chassis or parts from those teams, those teams have to have the chassis made and parts bought for those cars, also if there is a change in safety regs the team buying must do all relevant mods to pass crash tests or associated regs.

This way a team cannot go out and buy a BGP001 or RB5 and stick it in the midfield, they have to spend a time with a licensed VJM/02 or FW31 for example. Might work, might not. But will provide the midfield teams with another source of income for say €10m a year, which they wont turn down.

User avatar
dice782
0
Joined: 23 Mar 2010, 20:50
Location: UK

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

Francesc wrote:Image
Look at the right rear tyre looks like there is a crew in the tyre?

cbbcisace
cbbcisace
0
Joined: 17 Jan 2011, 00:31

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

wesley123 wrote:sure their pace improves, but not by 2.5 seconds by a simple front wing.
It will surely give the car more stability plus the car has never been set up before so the 2.5 seconds is simply trying to find the sweet spot in the package including the 2011 spec nose and FW.

nacho
nacho
6
Joined: 04 Sep 2009, 08:38

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

dice782 wrote:
Look at the right rear tyre looks like there is a crew in the tyre?
Man that looks like a torx or a philips screw. That's easily a few tenths there.

TURU
TURU
0
Joined: 31 Jan 2011, 21:26

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

Francesc wrote:Image
That cooling outlet at the back of the engine cover seems to be amusingly asymmetrical. :D

nacho
nacho
6
Joined: 04 Sep 2009, 08:38

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

I think it's just the angle and the middle wing support.

timd
timd
0
Joined: 03 Jun 2009, 13:27

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

wesley123 wrote:These texts on the car with 'this could be you' suddenly became very funny and ironic, that is for sure.

But this was just ridiculous, they where 9 seconds slower then the fastest car, 2 seconds slower then the virgin who was slow too. And Karthikeyan being almost 2 seconds slower then its team mate, just ridiculous

I hope this team goes bankrupt soon, and if not i hope the FIA takes away their license, these guys are just ridiculous.
I agree. When it started shedding its carbon into the Saubers path which was heading for Q3 i kind of set myself against this lot. Sauber being a team without tons of money trying damn hard to genuninely compete.

This is at the end of the day the top end of motorsport. Get with the program or dont turn up. Running it as a break even "rich boy pay driver" program is not F1 to me. Its not honest racing.

There are enough hobby series around to support people with way too much money to go racing.

The cars should be worthy.

User avatar
Spencifer_Murphy
0
Joined: 11 Apr 2004, 23:29
Location: London, England, UK

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

timd wrote:I agree. When it started shedding its carbon into the Saubers path which was heading for Q3 i kind of set myself against this lot. Sauber being a team without tons of money trying damn hard to genuninely compete...

...There are enough hobby series around to support people with way too much money to go racing.

The cars should be worthy.

We don't know if the car isn't worthy yet! They have essentially done their shakedown. Nobody looked at the Red Bull for example after its shakedown test and said "Its not worthy."

Yes, I agree the car should have been ready in time, but sometimes in life things don't always go according to plan.

And as if the Sauber didn't shed some carbon? it shedded half its blinking engine cover! God forbid a new car should have some easy to fix teething problems! The Sauber had the engine cover problem during pre-season testing, and again in Free Practice, I dont see you vilifying them. (And quite rightly not)

Who's to say HRT are not "a team without tons of money trying damn hard to genuninely compete". They've got a solid team boss, they've graciously accepted being outside the 107% rule (yes they protested, but wouldn't you? You dont get if you don't ask.), they've got two drivers who may well be paying for their seats but they DO have previous F1 experience AND they kinda have to get money from somewhere don't they?!

They've designed a car which, from its LOOKS, had most people on this very forum swooning about how much better it looked than the F110...

MAYBE, they over stretched themselves, were a little too ambious with the resources at their disposal and ended up with an unfinished car. At least they bloody tried!

Its so easy for us armchair experts to pass judgement with no real knowledge or facts. How about we see how the car turns out for real before we judge their credentials hmmmmm?
Silence is golden when you don't know a good answer.

marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

maybe the reality was the car will be finished to 1st race spec only in 6 weeks time and they will have to make do with what they have right now.
Even the best gannt diagramme will not do the work for you...so it´s not just proper project management but time constraints.
Of course you need to open up the backup route in time when you realise it will not panout as needed.And they obviously failed the crashtest ..so in this area they completely got it wrong as it was too tight scheduling and no real backup solution available (but who knows ,an extra ply of fibres would not have saved them maybe)

kilcoo316
kilcoo316
21
Joined: 09 Mar 2005, 16:45
Location: Kilcoo, Ireland

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

I cannot for the life of me see HRT finishing the season.


Who will sponsor a car that never qualifies?

User avatar
mith
0
Joined: 02 Feb 2010, 18:03
Location: Wrocław, Poland

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

wesley123 wrote:sure their pace improves, but not by 2.5 seconds by a simple front wing.
Yes, but that car wasn't basically set up at all, so huge gains to be found there.

User avatar
Pierce89
60
Joined: 21 Oct 2009, 18:38

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

timd wrote:
wesley123 wrote:These texts on the car with 'this could be you' suddenly became very funny and ironic, that is for sure.

But this was just ridiculous, they where 9 seconds slower then the fastest car, 2 seconds slower then the virgin who was slow too. And Karthikeyan being almost 2 seconds slower then its team mate, just ridiculous

I hope this team goes bankrupt soon, and if not i hope the FIA takes away their license, these guys are just ridiculous.
I agree. When it started shedding its carbon into the Saubers path which was heading for Q3 i kind of set myself against this lot. Sauber being a team without tons of money trying damn hard to genuninely compete.

This is at the end of the day the top end of motorsport. Get with the program or dont turn up. Running it as a break even "rich boy pay driver" program is not F1 to me. Its not honest racing.

There are enough hobby series around to support people with way too much money to go racing.

The cars should be worthy.
......
Last edited by Giblet on 27 Mar 2011, 16:02, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Removed personal comments
“To be able to actually make something is awfully nice”
Bruce McLaren on building his first McLaren racecars, 1970

“I've got to be careful what I say, but possibly to probably Juan would have had a bigger go”
Sir Frank Williams after the 2003 Canadian GP, where Ralf hesitated to pass brother M. Schumacher

wesley123
wesley123
204
Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 17:55

Re: HRT F111 Cosworth

Post

@Mith; true with that, but then we can state the Virgin's will improve as well as well as the rest of the field. So they might qualify in the coming races and after their first update, but after that my guess is that they will fall back again.
"Bite my shiny metal ass" - Bender