Or maybe Vettel is collecting a "gem" and look good in the statisticsMr Alcatraz wrote:Ray that was a two flying lap stint so as much as I fear Red Bull are toying with the rest of the field. THAT is not a good example of it.raymondu999 wrote:Wow... Vettel doing a 1:23 on silver-branded tyres.
Then what was the "Wow......" for dog!raymondu999 wrote:nothing's a good example from practice. A car could be running 0 ballast and do a whole 20-lap stint underweight. Or it could be doing 2 laps of full tanks on hard tyres.
We haven't seen too much of anything from Red Bull to get an accurate picture. Yes, the two lap stint was meaningless.Mr Alcatraz wrote:Ray that was a two flying lap stint so as much as I fear Red Bull are toying with the rest of the field. THAT is not a good example of it.
24 degrees isn't very cold at all ray....raymondu999 wrote: The wow was for the fact that any lap worth a 1:23 is quite good, compared to pole 2011. Give 8 tenths because of the fact it was on hard tyres; and also the very cold track temps
Indeedraymondu999 wrote:Autosport is reporting 10 degrees C, 50 F. As is weather.com. Where are you getting 24?
Bro I'm from the land where that expression came from. Don't be silly with the spelling propriety. No I wasn't insulting you. The rest of your post is just a bad excuse. It's ok to be excited about it, but we all know that we don't know squat on a squat stick as to the value of it. That's all. I'm glad it made you happy slick!raymondu999 wrote:Are you calling me a dog, or do you mean "dawg?" They mean very different things.
The wow was for the fact that any lap worth a 1:23 is quite good, compared to pole 2011. Give 8 tenths because of the fact it was on hard tyres; and also the very cold track temps
^^^15:07 The track temperature is dropping as the day draws in. It was 31 degrees a few hours ago, but is now 24 degrees. Still better than this morning's 0.5 degrees.
English isn't even my first; second; third nor even fourth or fifth language. Not even 1% of my countrymen speak the language. So when I speak it or hear/read other people's use of it I need to make pretty damn sure I'm understanding it correct. Just because dawg sounds like dog and an assumption of "surely you would have no malicious intent" suggests you meant dawg; it doesn't mean you said dawg.Mr Alcatraz wrote:Bro I'm from the land where that expression came from. Don't be silly with the spelling propriety. No I wasn't insulting you. The rest of your post is just a bad excuse. It's ok to be excited about it, but we all know that we don't know squat on a squat stick as to the value of it. That's all. I'm glad it made you happy slick!raymondu999 wrote:Are you calling me a dog, or do you mean "dawg?" They mean very different things.
The wow was for the fact that any lap worth a 1:23 is quite good, compared to pole 2011. Give 8 tenths because of the fact it was on hard tyres; and also the very cold track temps