Yes I agree it was not a smart move to throw away experienced personnel when experience is more valuable to a team with very limited funding. If you read back in this thread before the start of the season you will see people expressing concern about this issue. I doubt that if the transition was handled in stages then the F112 would be as unreliable as it was.beelsebob wrote:After two full years in Formula 1, they should not have inexperience or incompetence left. You may say they've just replaced everyone, but then the question of course is... Why dump all the experienced people?Petroltorque wrote:The reason they are missing their targets is down to lack of money and inexperienced/incompetent management.
I don't believe you – the normal quoted benefit of KERS is more like 0.4 seconds a lap. Marussia aren't using KERS either.Around Albert Park DRS and KERS is worth around 1.5s a lap. Since HRT weren't running KERS any expected gain is a fraction of that.
I am a fan of HRT and I really want them to succeed, but we have to be honest with ourselves, there is no excuse that the team was unable to get their car running in time/ barely running in time. This is a management issue because management should plan ahead and make contingencies to ensure such things never happen, despite the limited budget. These are the types of things that cost the team & can cause their downfall.
I think that since HRT have had some more time to deal with the situation they will be better prepared for the next race and I am sure we will at least see one car in the race, its not ideal but the new owners chose to restart a team from scratch now we have an 80% new team that hardly know each other or know their car. What ever skill the team have and what ever performance the car has we can only know once the car actually starts running in a race.
I really wish HRT good luck