
This thread is about the car itself, not about the race...
What is this model made from ? looks like not carbon fibrecbbcisace wrote:Thats the F111 you can tell by the nose... but also HRT are using that front wing on the F112 atm..dice782 wrote:FrukostScones wrote:In an interview with Perez-Sala I ve read, he said that the design of the monocoque is made by http://www.dash-cae.co.uk/index.html maybe also the production.
I was looking at the link you posted, the prototype car image below looks very much like the F112(except the nose and front wing). Lets hope all the people that put an effort in the car get rewarded with some amazing results
Must be as the website for the company http://www.dash-cae.co.uk/index.html say they do rapid prototypes.sesku wrote:Is that model made from rapid prototype material? it look like it.
No thats Antenna 3 the Spanish F1 broadcaster, We never see HRT on any of the English channels. Hopefully Sky or BBC will interview them next racetenali wrote:nice vedio!!! any english versions............
Sauber-sidepod-wings should also be quite easy to implement.cbbcisace wrote:I was thinking new nose, front wing and KERS.
Cant decide if that was sarcasm or not ?!?! :AnthonyG wrote:Sauber-sidepod-wings should also be quite easy to implement.cbbcisace wrote:I was thinking new nose, front wing and KERS.
I was thinking a new front wing, revised sidepods and close to definitive exhaust posistion, new floor and KERS finally bolted into the car. With the car loosing weight as well, and a few mechanichal improvements to the suspension like J Dampers and other things they cant run, not to mention opening up the data channels on the SECU as this can be worth more time than an actual performance part as it gives better understanding of the car.cbbcisace wrote:Cant decide if that was sarcasm or not ?!?! : :oAnthonyG wrote:Sauber-sidepod-wings should also be quite easy to implement.cbbcisace wrote:I was thinking new nose, front wing and KERS.
Not necessarily... not if they can't package it in an effective manner, and finding space for the battery pack and control unit as well as cooling it effectively is something it took the top teams a while to get right.ESPImperium wrote:... May be worth 4 thenths in higher up cars, but will be worth more lap time in a slower car.
De la Rosa said that the car was designed to have KERS on it. They decided not to use it so they could understand the car better without woreying about problems with KERS. I think that was a clever move, after seeing some problems in Australia and Malaysia.Lycoming wrote:Not necessarily... not if they can't package it in an effective manner, and finding space for the battery pack and control unit as well as cooling it effectively is something it took the top teams a while to get right.ESPImperium wrote:... May be worth 4 thenths in higher up cars, but will be worth more lap time in a slower car.
additionally, it could just cause even more headaches for a team struggling to get on the starting grid. Don't forget about red bull's troubles with KERS at the start of last year.