Refueling + Pirelli = Better racing?

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: Refueling + Pirelli = Better racing?

Post

Just for clarity's sake, I positively abhor the version of F1 we've seen this year. I find it silly and contrived, and I think it's the result of people putting band-aids on problems instead of really addressing them. So, the last thing it needs is yet another band-aid.

(Please take my views with a pinch of salt here, because they tend to fall outside of the mainstream in most areas. And don't consider any of this a condemnation of anyone who legitimately enjoys this year's brand of F1. They're just my views.)

User avatar
razorbum
1
Joined: 26 Jun 2012, 17:47

Re: Refueling + Pirelli = Better racing?

Post

Just an idea that just came to my head. What about just a single compound for a race.

That may be boring on the technology front but wouldn't that test the drivers on their tire conservation skills? They even have to estimate how hard/little they can push their tires before pitting to avoid traffic at the pits. It can vary from a 1 stop to 3 stop race.

Then it would be the car and driver instead of having tires to make the difference.

Like Raikkonen says, tires are just tires at the end of the day.

bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: Refueling + Pirelli = Better racing?

Post

That's how it was prior to 2007. Ah, those were the days.

User avatar
razorbum
1
Joined: 26 Jun 2012, 17:47

Re: Refueling + Pirelli = Better racing?

Post

Well I was not a fan of F1 then. Sure hope we go towards there!

I think the different compound can still be there for the excitement each race, but with only 1 compound to be used each weekend. I think the teams should be more involved before the race, but when it's the race it's all up to the drivers to fight it out.

Then maybe we can see more defensive drive like what Hamilton did to Maldonado instead of using the tires to get away. I honestly enjoyed that (before they crashed)

Jersey Tom
Jersey Tom
166
Joined: 29 May 2006, 20:49
Location: Huntersville, NC

Re: Refueling + Pirelli = Better racing?

Post

LHamilton wrote:Ive been thinking about having refueling again, but with the Pirelli tyres. Wouldnt it be better?
Why would it be?

Consistent performance out of the tires. That's all I ask for.
Grip is a four letter word. All opinions are my own and not those of current or previous employers.

User avatar
ecapox
8
Joined: 14 May 2010, 21:06

Re: Refueling + Pirelli = Better racing?

Post

bhallg2k wrote:Just for clarity's sake, I positively abhor the version of F1 we've seen this year. I find it silly and contrived, and I think it's the result of people putting band-aids on problems instead of really addressing them. So, the last thing it needs is yet another band-aid.

(Please take my views with a pinch of salt here, because they tend to fall outside of the mainstream in most areas. And don't consider any of this a condemnation of anyone who legitimately enjoys this year's brand of F1. They're just my views.)
=D>

bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: Refueling + Pirelli = Better racing?

Post

razorbum wrote:Well I was not a fan of F1 then. Sure hope we go towards there!

I think the different compound can still be there for the excitement each race, but with only 1 compound to be used each weekend. I think the teams should be more involved before the race, but when it's the race it's all up to the drivers to fight it out.

Then maybe we can see more defensive drive like what Hamilton did to Maldonado instead of using the tires to get away. I honestly enjoyed that (before they crashed)
Welcome to F1 and to the forum as well.

Prior to 2007, Michelin competed against Bridgestone, and each company brought two compounds to each race. Their respective teams would then test those compounds, called prime and option, on Friday to determine which was best suited for the prevailing conditions that weekend. Those tires then became the ones they used for both qualifying and the race.

The teams' success waxed and waned largely on the performance of their tires. For instance, Ferrari's five-year stranglehold on the World Championship was broken in 2005 by a new requirement that a single set of tires had to last throughout all of qualifying and the entire race. Bridgestone was not up to this task, and its teams, including Ferrari, suffered dearly.

(Incidentally, that rule was discarded in short order.)

Because tires were so important, teams spent a lot of time testing them. It got so ridiculous and expensive that the FIA decided F1 should use a single tire supplier. It was hoped this would contain costs and de-emphasize the importance of tires in the sport. Bridgestone became that supplier in 2007.

That's when the two-compound requirement was introduced to F1. Without it, no one would have even so much as thought of the tires, and that's not good for a tire company that uses motorsport as advertising. So, the two-compound rule is nothing but a marketing gimmick to keep people talking. Pirelli has taken that tactic to the extreme.

At any rate, that's a very condensed version of recent tire happenings in F1. I'm sure others will point out things I've missed.

(Funny how F1 made it a big point to diminish the role of the tires, and now, just over five years later, tires are right back at the forefront. History, as they say ...)

User avatar
razorbum
1
Joined: 26 Jun 2012, 17:47

Re: Refueling + Pirelli = Better racing?

Post

Thank you!

I think that varying the compound each weekend would post more challenge to the team to fine tune the car each weekend. After all I think that F1 is about the ability of the team + the driver. Having more compounds adds an element of surprise for the teams while keeping the playing field levelled each weekend for all the teams.