Grosjean banned. Reasoning?

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
aero expert 807
aero expert 807
1
Joined: 17 Aug 2012, 00:51

Re: Grosjean banned. Reasoning?

Post

I wish the FIA would prevent incidents rather than reacting to them.
They should have penalized Grosjean a long time ago instead of waiting till someone almost got there head decapitated.
They should also give Maldonado some serious penalties if he doesn't stop being wreckless.

the EDGE
the EDGE
67
Joined: 13 Feb 2012, 18:31
Location: Bedfordshire ENGLAND

Re: I get it now.

Post

jdlive wrote:Shouldn't they be penalizing cause instead of consequence? This is a bit childish.

Grosjean made a small mistake, we've seen way bigger ones this season, both in severity and especially in intent. It's not Grosjean's fault it ended up with an almost decapitated Alonso.
A small mistake? Romain darted to the right hand side of the track for no reason other than he choose too (it would have been different had he been forced too) He crowded Lewis off the track and made a serious error of judgement by both getting way too close to lewis, and far worst locking his back wheel behind Lewis' front wheel giving Lewis both no where to go and no chance to brake

I can't believe some people are commenting without even seeing the footage first, they ARE penalising the cause and not the consequence

User avatar
strad
117
Joined: 02 Jan 2010, 01:57

Re: Grosjean banned. Reasoning?

Post

Yes Grosjean was on the racing line and he was in the clear but mostly on the start the inside of the corner is the quicker way to go. I can understand Grosjean going to the inside, however I cannot justify him not seeing Hamilton.
.
He has tiny little mirrors in which you can' see much but Hamilon had Grosjean ahead ansd to his left and could see him coming the whole way. He has a responsibility to avoid contact he sees coming..The Frenchman was ahead of Louis. After initial contact..if you've watched frame by frame, Louis stays on the throttle for a long time when he should have had faster reactions and got onto his brakes...he didn't...he exacerbated the whole thing by pushing Grosjean.
I ain't down on Louis but this time he could have avoided the whole thing.
I think y'all are being very hard on Romain.
We know that La Source is a very tough corner. It was a bit of a crazy start as well with [Pastor] Maldonado leaving [early] and the Sauber [Kamui Kobayashi] smoking a lot.

"I did a mistake and I misjudged the gap with Lewis [Hamilton]. I was sure I was in front of him. So a small mistake made a big incident."
What I think is interesting is the reasoning by the stewards...
"The Stewards regard this as an extremely serious breach of the regulations which had the potential to cause injury to others. It eliminated leading championship contenders from the race......
The highlighted part shouldn't even enter into it. ;)
To achieve anything, you must be prepared to dabble on the boundary of disaster.”
Sir Stirling Moss

Richard
Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: Grosjean banned. Reasoning?

Post

I agree. The scale of the consequences should be a factor just like any other consideration of negligence. It should be about the number of drivers knocked out, who they were should be irrelevant.

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: Grosjean banned. Reasoning?

Post

richard_leeds wrote:I agree. The scale of the consequences should be a factor just like any other consideration of negligence. It should be about the number of drivers knocked out, who they were should be irrelevant.
Looking at the number should be looked at a case by case basis; in the case of a start I pretty much agree to take that into the equation: you are doing something dangerous in a situation where alot of cars will always be around you. I do feel like this should not be put into the equation during the race itself when you crash with somebody and one or two cars behind that also get caught up. The chance is alot smaller that that happens and is a case of very bad luck when you do make that mistake.

So in this case it is correct to look at the number of cars: Grosjean was careless in a situation were there would always be cars around him and with more cars crashing the risk that one driver gets hurt rises significantly. It was horrifying to watch those cars fly over Alonso's and Kobayashi's cars.
#AeroFrodo

mantikos
mantikos
35
Joined: 02 Mar 2011, 17:35

Re: Grosjean banned. Reasoning?

Post

He's done similar stuff all season long, how can we forget vs MSC in Monaco? he's been involved in more incidents than any other driver, this guy is an idiot!

RB7ate9
RB7ate9
2
Joined: 13 Jul 2011, 03:03

Re: Grosjean banned. Reasoning?

Post

strad wrote:
He has tiny little mirrors in which you can' see much but Hamilon had Grosjean ahead ansd to his left and could see him coming the whole way. He has a responsibility to avoid contact he sees coming..The Frenchman was ahead of Louis. After initial contact..if you've watched frame by frame, Louis stays on the throttle for a long time when he should have had faster reactions and got onto his brakes...he didn't...he exacerbated the whole thing by pushing Grosjean.
I ain't down on Louis but this time he could have avoided the whole thing.
I think y'all are being very hard on Romain.
Watching the video posted earlier of the incident, Lewis was between a rock and a hard place. Better put: he was between Romain's front tire, rear tire, and the wall. In regards to hitting the brakes, they were still through acceleration when they made contact and Lewis' fronts lifted, essentially removing the effort from those brakes as well as being launched upwards, reducing efficiency of the rear brakes. In this particular case (bear in mind I am no flag-waver for Hamilton), Hamilton was stuck in a situation out of his control.

jdlive
jdlive
-3
Joined: 23 Oct 2011, 12:16

Re: Grosjean banned. Reasoning?

Post

That video shows Grosjean was clearly PAST Hamilton and instead of lifting, Hamilton kept on the throttle...
"There is a credit card with the Ferrari logo, issued by Santander, which gives the scuderia a % of purchases made with the card...

I would guess that such a serious amount of money would allow them to ignore the constant complains of a car that was nowhere near as bad as their #1 driver tried to sell throughout the season.

Heck, a car on which Massa finishes in the podium or has to lift so that his teammate finishes ahead (As we saw often in the final races of the year) is, by no means, a "bad" car."

jdlive
jdlive
-3
Joined: 23 Oct 2011, 12:16

Re: I get it now.

Post

the EDGE wrote:
jdlive wrote:Shouldn't they be penalizing cause instead of consequence? This is a bit childish.

Grosjean made a small mistake, we've seen way bigger ones this season, both in severity and especially in intent. It's not Grosjean's fault it ended up with an almost decapitated Alonso.
A small mistake? Romain darted to the right hand side of the track for no reason other than he choose too (it would have been different had he been forced too) He crowded Lewis off the track and made a serious error of judgement by both getting way too close to lewis, and far worst locking his back wheel behind Lewis' front wheel giving Lewis both no where to go and no chance to brake

I can't believe some people are commenting without even seeing the footage first, they ARE penalising the cause and not the consequence
He was basically past him, he had every right to. Are we watching the same video?
"There is a credit card with the Ferrari logo, issued by Santander, which gives the scuderia a % of purchases made with the card...

I would guess that such a serious amount of money would allow them to ignore the constant complains of a car that was nowhere near as bad as their #1 driver tried to sell throughout the season.

Heck, a car on which Massa finishes in the podium or has to lift so that his teammate finishes ahead (As we saw often in the final races of the year) is, by no means, a "bad" car."

User avatar
Ray
2
Joined: 22 Nov 2006, 06:33
Location: Atlanta

Re: I get it now.

Post

jdlive wrote:That video shows Grosjean was clearly PAST Hamilton and instead of lifting, Hamilton kept on the throttle...
jdlive wrote: He was basically past him, he had every right to. Are we watching the same video?
He was nowhere near past him, he has absolutely no right to shove Lewis onto the grass. You must not be watching the same video because it's clear as day he wasn't past him. You must be watching a re-enactment because there was no before the Grosjean-initiated contact where he was anything close to being ahead. The reason Lewis hit him from behind is that Grosjean drove him into the grass slowing him down and getting him out of shape. Grosjean couldn't be more at fault for this entire accident unless he got out of his car and sliced everyone tires. The moron has no spatial awareness.

Image
strad wrote:.... Louis stays on the throttle for a long time when he should have had faster reactions and got onto his brakes...he didn't...he exacerbated the whole thing by pushing Grosjean.
What?! Lewis pushed Grosjean? Do you have corrected vision? Grosjean quite literally drove into Lewis. Full stop. The onboard video clearly shows it, and the other cameras showing him cutting right across the track and over the front of Lewis' car. This was clearly a stupid and dangerous move by Grosjean. One he's done before.
Last edited by Ray on 03 Sep 2012, 22:54, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: Grosjean banned. Reasoning?

Post

The rules are clear: you need to leave one car width between yourself and the track before you fully past the car. Romain clearly didn't do that here, as Hamilton was still half a length next to Romain.
#AeroFrodo

User avatar
Ray
2
Joined: 22 Nov 2006, 06:33
Location: Atlanta

Re: Grosjean banned. Reasoning?

Post

turbof1 wrote:The rules are clear: you need to leave one car width between yourself and the track before you fully past the car. Romain clearly didn't do that here, as Hamilton was still half a length next to Romain.
I thought that was only in a defensive maneuver?

morefirejules08
morefirejules08
4
Joined: 11 Feb 2012, 14:21

Re: Grosjean banned. Reasoning?

Post

jdlive wrote:That video shows Grosjean was clearly PAST Hamilton and instead of lifting, Hamilton kept on the throttle...
If Grosjean was past Hamilton then he wouldn't have hit him would he?
The fact is Grosjean had no reason to be that close to Hamilton considering there were no other cars around him.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sCaRAty9iY[/youtube]
watch the video from 1:20
Grosjeans car appears at Hamiltons left hand side at about 1:22.8 by 1:23.9 Grosjean has hit him, that gives him barely 1.1 seconds to react and if he lets off the throttle you still get the tyre contact as Groseans tyres are within Hamiltons.

Past incidents should be taken into account when considering a punishment as it gives a picture of the drivers mentality. someone on either this or another thread mentioned a yellow/red card system similar to football where you are given a number of warnings then a ban, personally i think a similar system would do well in F1 and may curtail some of the dangerous driving.
Last edited by morefirejules08 on 03 Sep 2012, 23:36, edited 2 times in total.

Jersey Tom
Jersey Tom
166
Joined: 29 May 2006, 20:49
Location: Huntersville, NC

Re: Grosjean banned. Reasoning?

Post

This is pretty clear cut and done with folks. No sense in getting your panties in a bunch over it.

It's not just about this ONE incident. It's a summation of start crashes, and this was the last straw for the stewards.
Grip is a four letter word. All opinions are my own and not those of current or previous employers.

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: Grosjean banned. Reasoning?

Post

Ray wrote:
turbof1 wrote:The rules are clear: you need to leave one car width between yourself and the track before you fully past the car. Romain clearly didn't do that here, as Hamilton was still half a length next to Romain.
I thought that was only in a defensive maneuver?
I heard several commentators use the rule in this occasion. I am not sure though, you could be right. Well, it doesn't matter so much anyhow; Grosjean wasn't ahead of him.
Jersey Tom wrote:This is pretty clear cut and done with folks. No sense in getting your panties in a bunch over it.

It's not just about this ONE incident. It's a summation of start crashes, and this was the last straw for the stewards.
Well i think most of us agree on the penalty itself, but not in the context it was placed.
#AeroFrodo