I don't think it's unreasonable to assume that Mercedes probably gave Schumacher the chance to stay if he was willing to partner Hamilton. Rosberg's got talent, but not enough to justify being favored over a seven-time World Champion by default. Even Schumacher's marketing value is worth more than Rosberg's driving ability.zyphro wrote:[...]
Face the reality: MGP have humiliated him, he won't stand for that.
Hey, I don't have a problem with the ousting of Schumacher. I actually agree with much of what you said. However, the affair was handled extremely unfairly given how much the team had let Schumacher down this season already.bhallg2k wrote:I don't think it's unreasonable to assume that Mercedes probably gave Schumacher the chance to stay if he was willing to partner Hamilton. Rosberg's got talent, but not enough to justify being favored over a seven-time World Champion by default. Even Schumacher's marketing value is worth more than Rosberg's driving ability.zyphro wrote:[...]
Face the reality: MGP have humiliated him, he won't stand for that.
I think Schumacher just didn't want any part of it, much like he wasn't willing to partner Raikkonen at Ferrari in 2007. So, he had to go.
Mercedes really had no choice in the matter, either, because a team that's serious about winning simply cannot afford to let an available driver like Hamilton, warts and all, slip through their fingers. He's got the speed and, perhaps most importantly, the youth to build around. Neither Schumacher nor Rosberg possess both of those qualities. That means Hamilton is an upgrade no matter how you slice it.
The same thing happened to Raikkonen at Ferrari when Alonso became available. In fact, the team paid Raikkonen a ----ton of money to make way for the better driver.
F1 is strategic; it's not sentimental.
I fully expect Schumacher will retire rather than fight in the mid-field - again - with a team like Sauber or be dominated by Alonso at Ferrari. (And to be fair, I don't think Alonso would be thrilled with the prospect of a Schumacher homecoming in Maranello, either.)
Suppose.bhallg2k wrote:I don't know how else it could have happened, though. This is what break-ups look like. (Trust me. I know.)
dude understand MIcheal had chance to sign this Contract with Merc earlier in season but he didn't want!! so Mercedes was forced to find another driver next year.zyphro wrote:Suppose.bhallg2k wrote:I don't know how else it could have happened, though. This is what break-ups look like. (Trust me. I know.)
Though, I wouldn't want to see MS being 'retired' like that. I still feel he has a lot to give, even though he is slower comparable to his first career (understandably so, aging etc). However, despite that, he's still able to compete to a high level and has this season, outperformed his team mate. He still has the passion to race. This has come to an end with Mercedes, but, I think he may find it again at a team like Sauber.
Aside from all that, it's still great to have him on the grid. I've never understood the argument of him tarnishing his legacy and the fact he should make way for 'young blood': if he can still compete at a high level, and, enjoys the racing, why shouldn't he be on the grid?
clipsy1H wrote:dude understand MIcheal had chance to sign this Contract with Merc earlier in season but he didn't want!! so Mercedes was forced to find another driver next year.zyphro wrote:Suppose.bhallg2k wrote:I don't know how else it could have happened, though. This is what break-ups look like. (Trust me. I know.)
Though, I wouldn't want to see MS being 'retired' like that. I still feel he has a lot to give, even though he is slower comparable to his first career (understandably so, aging etc). However, despite that, he's still able to compete to a high level and has this season, outperformed his team mate. He still has the passion to race. This has come to an end with Mercedes, but, I think he may find it again at a team like Sauber.
Aside from all that, it's still great to have him on the grid. I've never understood the argument of him tarnishing his legacy and the fact he should make way for 'young blood': if he can still compete at a high level, and, enjoys the racing, why shouldn't he be on the grid?
You talk no-sense here..... and refuse to face reality. look around you and wake-up!!! This guy choose to retire none force him. Not anyone's fault that he changed his mind on the way .....
+1zyphro wrote:clipsy1H wrote:dude understand MIcheal had chance to sign this Contract with Merc earlier in season but he didn't want!! so Mercedes was forced to find another driver next year.zyphro wrote:
Suppose.
Though, I wouldn't want to see MS being 'retired' like that. I still feel he has a lot to give, even though he is slower comparable to his first career (understandably so, aging etc). However, despite that, he's still able to compete to a high level and has this season, outperformed his team mate. He still has the passion to race. This has come to an end with Mercedes, but, I think he may find it again at a team like Sauber.
Aside from all that, it's still great to have him on the grid. I've never understood the argument of him tarnishing his legacy and the fact he should make way for 'young blood': if he can still compete at a high level, and, enjoys the racing, why shouldn't he be on the grid?
You talk no-sense here..... and refuse to face reality. look around you and wake-up!!! This guy choose to retire none force him. Not anyone's fault that he changed his mind on the way .....
You're a broken record.