Does it really matter if it happens during a start or during the race?Jersey Tom wrote:How many race starts did Hamilton wreck out last year?jdlive wrote:Then they need to revoke Hamilton's superlicense as well for last season's antics.
jdlive wrote:Does it really matter if it happens during a start or during the race?Jersey Tom wrote:How many race starts did Hamilton wreck out last year?jdlive wrote:Then they need to revoke Hamilton's superlicense as well for last season's antics.
Completely different matter. Also you can´t simply look at one side of the coin as Massa was his companion in at least 5 of the incidents.jdlive wrote:Does it really matter if it happens during a start or during the race?
Yes, that seems to be the problem. Lotus may have to give him a race engineer who can also baby sit him through the race by anticipating problems ahead and mentally prepare him. That and some mental training to cope with the excess agression at the race start.Kiril Varbanov wrote:Being able to extract pace for one lap out of the car doesn't really make you suitable for F1 - you have to drive that car through the finish line and get a points. ... Romain needs a lesson. Being out of race is certainly not a lesson - he needs proper mentality and racing experience.
I don't agree here. There are so many examples of drivers who had the same amount of testing time: Perez, Di Resta, Hulk, even maldonado, and who did it better then Grosjean. Furthermore, teams have simulators. There's not really an excuse to keep repeating the same mistake.Raptor22 wrote:The real causal is the lack of testing.
If he was given more testing time He would be more comfortable.
Competancy in 95% repetitive action and 5% pure skill. This testing restriction is not playing into building good competant drivers. Its ruining more careers than creating them.
If he started from the pits for the next 2 or 3 races he might settle down and learn a bit of race craft without the massive pressure of screwing up yet another first lap. FP1 2 & 3 is for practice and race setup as well, not just for qualifying. Grosjean could obviously do with all the practice he can get currently so that argument doesn't really hold water. And even if it did (which it doesn't) - so what? He loses out on something because of his mistakes? Isn't that the definition of a punishment?waynes wrote:ok so the options
pit lane starts - whats the point of him turning up for FP1, 2 + 3 then?
ban him - no opportunity for him to learn
fantastic suggestions
here's something from left field - why not let him carry on taking race starts? shock horror, he's a kid, a very fast kid under pressure to perform against a very fast rally driver / former F1 world champion. nerves mean nothing. he's trying too hard.
who gives a flying turd about mark webber, he's a moaning always hard done by idiot who's got just enough talent to justify a red bull drive. i'd rather Webber left the sport than Romain.
rant over before i start swearing
lukeaar wrote: Maldonado has driven a couple of very clean, impressive even, races. It might be luck, or it might be that he's learning.
So why do you think PM deserves a few races to prove he's alright, and not Romain ?Ray wrote: Well, he's been flying under the radar and not over his competitors cars. Maybe that's the difference!
With all due respect, this time it was nothing like SPA and Monaco. In those occasions he was well ahead of other cars - apart from his rear tire. If you come to think of it, drivers like Alonso and Hamilton have done the same mistake at least once in the past 2 years (Hamilton at SPA 2011, and Alonso this weekend). So you should just cut a half rookie some slack for thatWebsta wrote:The same as his incident in Spa and Monaco - no awareness of anything outside his focus.
I meant that all three accidents resulted from him focusing on one car and missing the other completely - but you could say that is the cause of all collisions at the start of a race, aside from outbreaking, so it was a pretty weak comment on my part.Shrieker wrote:With all due respect, this time it was nothing like SPA and Monaco. In those occasions he was well ahead of other cars - apart from his rear tire.Websta wrote:The same as his incident in Spa and Monaco - no awareness of anything outside his focus.
Yeah, I agree - no need to beat a dead horse. The discussion should be put on hold until after Korea (hopefully he keeps it clean and doesn't interfere with the championship there)Shrieker wrote: If you come to think of it, drivers like Alonso and Hamilton have done the same mistake at least once in the past 2 years (Hamilton at SPA 2011, and Alonso this weekend). So you should just cut a half rookie some slack for thatBut I agree his blunder this time was far worse. I think he was trying to avoid Perez and keep ahead of him at the same time, but didn't think he'd close on Webber so fast - he expected empty tarmac there. Bad error of judgement, served his penalty - which sends a clear signal that he'll be banned again if he screws up once more.
Time to move on.
I agree with this.Raptor22 wrote:The real causal is the lack of testing.
If he was given more testing time He would be more comfortable.
Competancy in 95% repetitive action and 5% pure skill. This testing restriction is not playing into building good competant drivers. Its ruining more careers than creating them.