good read.
http://www.planetf1.com/editorial/82952 ... -Losing-It
I read somewhere that the SC actually made his alternator last a little bit longer.bhallg2k wrote:Huh?
What makes it a good read? And please, show me a single multi-WDC in the last 35 years who can be called a genuine sportsman?Raptor22 wrote:good read.
http://www.planetf1.com/editorial/82952 ... -Losing-It
I don't think there is. A large part of what fuels them to be competitive creatures IS that they're sore losers. Now I'm not saying it's a bad thing - I'm one of the world's sorest losers myself. But (without reading the article) - I personally agree that Alonso isn't a good sportsman. Nor is Hamilton/Vettel/Raikkonen/etc, for that matter. They all want to win - and hate it when others win.timbo wrote:What makes it a good read? And please, show me a single multi-WDC in the last 35 years who can be called a genuine sportsman?Raptor22 wrote:good read.
http://www.planetf1.com/editorial/82952 ... -Losing-It
Source: http://www.darrenheath.com/season/2012/ ... -and-mindsOther certainly more trivial matters – in a purely machismo-obsessed F1 paddock way – increase Fernando’s standing in the paddock. Our Spanish hero is not only quick on track but swift with the ladies too, reputedly having bedded the majority of the more attractive female TV presenting dollies that flounce up and down Formula 1’s expensive catwalk.
The clarification was not only a poke at red bull it was also a slap to the stewards who they considered hadn't done their jobs. A quite word in Charlie's ear would have prevented all of this as charlie would gave a quiet word back clearing it up. Instead it was a public and official attempt to take something which was not theirs and too which they still consider they deserve more.Nando wrote:We cant really blame Ferrari and Alonso for wanting clarification.