I disagree. The internet was going crazy the days after the event and FIA did not clarify anything officially.Cam wrote:The clarification was not only a poke at red bull it was also a slap to the stewards who they considered hadn't done their jobs. A quite word in Charlie's ear would have prevented all of this as charlie would gave a quiet word back clearing it up. Instead it was a public and official attempt to take something which was not theirs and too which they still consider they deserve more.
Without a case there was nothing to clarify!Nando wrote:I disagree. The internet was going crazy the days after the event and FIA did not clarify anything officially.Cam wrote:The clarification was not only a poke at red bull it was also a slap to the stewards who they considered hadn't done their jobs. A quite word in Charlie's ear would have prevented all of this as charlie would gave a quiet word back clearing it up. Instead it was a public and official attempt to take something which was not theirs and too which they still consider they deserve more.
So Ferrari simply requested an offical clarification on the matter.
They did not say "ohh Vettel cheated, hang him!!" they simply wanted clarification and rightfully so.
If Red Bull and Vettel is butt-hurt for that then they should grow thicker skin.
They did not try to take anything, it would be IMPOSSIBLE to do, surely you must understand such a fundamental thing?
Excuse me, but in the video which caused the stir the green flag was indeed not visible. So from that video it seemed like it was illegal overtake. That's all.FrukostScones wrote:Without a case there was nothing to clarify!
but no one Ferrari etc. asked the FIA to open the case. i.e. protested!timbo wrote:Excuse me, but in the video which caused the stir the green flag was indeed not visible. So from that video it seemed like it was illegal overtake. That's all.FrukostScones wrote:Without a case there was nothing to clarify!
And yet, they did...FrukostScones wrote:Without a case there was nothing to clarify!
Exactly. they wanted CLARIFICATION.FrukostScones wrote:but no one Ferrari etc. asked the FIA to open the case. i.e. protested!
after what?Nando wrote:And yet, they did...FrukostScones wrote:Without a case there was nothing to clarify!
After the buzz on the internet and the shitty video that did not show much to begin with.FrukostScones wrote:after what?Nando wrote:And yet, they did...FrukostScones wrote:Without a case there was nothing to clarify!
are you always trying to bend the reality when you run out of arguments.Nando wrote:......
Again, do you understand the word clarification? Do you truly understand it´s meaning?
LOL, planet f1.......says it all, absolute nonsense. The sheer amount of paranoia surrounding Fernando is staggering, if you believe this kind of press, Fernando Picks the drivers at Ferrari, Fernando told massa to take the gearbox penalty, Fernando vetoed Perez because he was afraid of him (FoxHound wrote:I understand that Alonso is also responsible for stealing children's toys the day before Christmas.
He can also impregnate your wife from a hundred yards.
Why xxxxxxx is a poor sportsman.
Indeed, a thread borne of bitterness.
they wanted a clarification to suppress the negative yellow flag mania and to avoid an ongoing PR desaster. They did not protest on sunday they did not protest entirely. They just wanted the shitstorm to stop, so they asked for clarification because the press, the internet and their sore loser star driver drove them to the point to do it.Nando wrote:Are you always trying to not understand words in order to continue a useless discussion?
Ferrari wanted clarification from FIA, what is the problem? Do you honestly think they can change results even if the facts say otherwise?