Titles and wins without sportsmahip have no value except the one on Schuey's bank account.
He didn't won the title in 1997,
and he will not win it 2006.
So the titles he won have a value.
I don't agree with this, whether he has earned it or not is a different matter, but we can't critisize drivers for being robots and showing no personality and then critisize them when they do. It's the same with Kimi liking the odd night out on the town.mep wrote: I say you one thing Alonso has a strange character
or how can you explain me allways those stupid dancing after
a victory which he hasn't earned.![]()
Damn right...... I blame Damon. Night all.wazojugs wrote:I think you are the only person who see's it that way.bhallg2k wrote:I want to get fully into how the 1994 incident with Hill was merely a racing incident (Schu had hit the wall a mere few seconds before hitting Hill, and he only hit Hill because his car was still unstable from the contact)
You know, If you were to tried MS for what he did to JV or DH, he'd probably get a manslaughter or 2nd degree murder. Manslaughter is usually done for a split moment thing. In MS's case he has something to gain so he probably would get it for 2nd degree. I highly doubt that MS decided to do that before those points of the race when he commits it. Just like he probably did not think he needs to park his car at La Rasscasse when going into the Q3 this year at Monaco.manchild wrote:
The diffrenece between Suzuka 1990 and 1997 is enormous. Prost and Senna had their clash in 1989 nad what Senna did wasn't good but it was pre-announced payback since Prost had responsibilty of Senna loosing WDC in 1989. Damon Hill and Jacques Villeneuve haven't done anything to Schuey in previous season and what Schuey did wasn't a payback but premeditated action do get rid of rivals he wasn't able to beat fairly. Damon Hill and Jacques Villeneuve were innocent victims while Prost wasn't. Not to mention that Senna and Prost were teammates in 1989 when first incident happened.
just because the style of racing has changed doesnt mean its any less of an accomplishment you can nolonger be teh fastest guy on the grid and win you need team workTom wrote:Yes, I have little doubt that if MS hadn't had a puncture he would have won, or at least come second to Massa fair and squre. I don't think Massa would have let MS through unless Alonso retired but MS would have tried to stick one up the inside into turn 1.
The main difference between the 2 incidents were teammates though. Neither Prost nor Senna had a team mate to hold the others up, a factor which was used regularely in this season.