Another thread that gives ppl chance to malign schumachermarcush. wrote:isn´t it just fantastic that a Webber /Vettel incident can bring up totally false accusations towards Schumacher who is retired already?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b09f9/b09f9321ee3b965cdadc22178a1f31771c6f3a47" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
Another thread that gives ppl chance to malign schumachermarcush. wrote:isn´t it just fantastic that a Webber /Vettel incident can bring up totally false accusations towards Schumacher who is retired already?
I absolutely agree with this.marcush. wrote:isn´t it just fantastic that a Webber /Vettel incident can bring up totally false accusations towards Schumacher who is retired already?
the ones claiming he EVER did something like that towards a teammate -ignoring team orders on purpose - may please so kind and enlighten us when this happened.i cannot rememnber any incident were he actively acted against orders from the team ...save his stampede against Coulthard in the Spa pits after colliding on track.
Schumacher certainly had or has his own set of facets in his character i would not subscribe to but first and most of all he did everything for the team and doing this he helped himself of course.
I think the teams should fill up their cars enough to allow their drivers to push till the end .The modern area shortfueling in hope of a procession race with a Safetycar phase is laying the ground for these artificial hold stationary scenarios ..for little gain in the race.But you need a justification for employment of those race strategists methinks ...
Its Hypocrital of Vettel because Vettel has always been the beneficiary of team orders, even calling for the team to move Mark out the way, but when team orders benefit Webber, Vettel totally ignores them. That fact that Vettel has always calling for team orders like a whinging little girl, makes him uncomparable to the likes of Aryton Senna who you have in your list.mnmracer wrote:Wow...
I can't remember there being so much drama after Webber ignored teamorders in Silverstone '11, but for some reason the whole F1 circus is imploding because Vettel gave the viewers a race rather than a progression.
Thinking back to a certain driver who said "if you no longer go for a gap that exists you are no longer a racing driver because we are competing, we are competing to win", it got me thinking, what other drivers would have also gone for the win in this situation?
Can you remind everyone what happened at Silverstone 2011? and then with a straight face say Webber ignored the team order.mnmracer wrote:I can't remember there being so much drama after Webber ignored teamorders in Silverstone '11,
this is not true. Hamilton was told not to challenge Alonso in Monaco and he stayed put.ChrisF1 wrote:If that had been Lewis and Fernando towards the end of 2007, they would have both made the move.
You igorned mnmracer completely about webber in silverstone 2011 or his blocking in brasil last year.n smikle wrote:Its Hypocrital of Vettel because Vettel has always been the beneficiary of team orders, even calling for the team to move Mark out the way, but when team orders benefit Webber, Vettel totally ignores them. That fact that Vettel has always calling for team orders like a whinging little girl, makes him uncomparable to the likes of Aryton Senna who you have in your list.mnmracer wrote:Wow...
I can't remember there being so much drama after Webber ignored teamorders in Silverstone '11, but for some reason the whole F1 circus is imploding because Vettel gave the viewers a race rather than a progression.
Thinking back to a certain driver who said "if you no longer go for a gap that exists you are no longer a racing driver because we are competing, we are competing to win", it got me thinking, what other drivers would have also gone for the win in this situation?
No you and mnmracer ignore the fact that webber OBEYED team orders in Silverstone 2011.Juzh wrote:You igorned mnmracer completely about webber in silverstone 2011 or his blocking in brasil last year.
Right, like helping him in brasil'12 at the start?Just_a_fan wrote:What Vettel did was put a torpedo in his chances of Webber helping later in the season. If Vettel needs Webber to hold someone up or get out of the way in order to secure the title he'll find Webber's radio isn't working all of a sudden.RB7ate9 wrote: What Vettel essentially did was put the first torpedo into Webber's chances of fighting for the WDC.
If Vettel really believed he could beat Webber by his own talent alone, he'd have banked today's second with a sly "Mark owes me today" over the radio. Mark would then be in the position of being expected to help out when needed. Now? Vettel is racing the rest of the season without a tail gunner. Good luck sonny.
I was to make the same comment, but he stated "towards the end of 2007". I sadly agree with that statement; there was absolutely no respect between those 2 anymore at that point.Nando wrote:this is not true. Hamilton was told not to challenge Alonso in Monaco and he stayed put.ChrisF1 wrote:If that had been Lewis and Fernando towards the end of 2007, they would have both made the move.
Also missing the option "NOBODY" in the poll.
Yes, when things were amicable between the pair it was all team first, driver second. As we saw later in the year, Hungary for example, the drivers were thinking about themselves and not the team.turbof1 wrote:I was to make the same comment, but he stated "towards the end of 2007". I sadly agree with that statement; there was absolutely no respect between those 2 anymore at that point.Nando wrote:this is not true. Hamilton was told not to challenge Alonso in Monaco and he stayed put.ChrisF1 wrote:If that had been Lewis and Fernando towards the end of 2007, they would have both made the move.
Also missing the option "NOBODY" in the poll.
He stayed put because he was unable to overtake him. He wanted to and tryed with his intentions 100% clear. He even confirmed it after the race.Nando wrote:No you and mnmracer ignore the fact that webber OBEYED team orders in Silverstone 2011.Juzh wrote:You igorned mnmracer completely about webber in silverstone 2011 or his blocking in brasil last year.
1. Alonso
2. +16,5s Vettel
3. +16.9s Webber
This result would have been impossible if Webber disobeyed team orders.
This is a propaganda-thread.
Exactly!Juzh wrote:He stayed put because he was unable to overtake him. He wanted to and tryed with his intentions 100% clear. He even confirmed it after the race.Nando wrote:No you and mnmracer ignore the fact that webber OBEYED team orders in Silverstone 2011.Juzh wrote:You igorned mnmracer completely about webber in silverstone 2011 or his blocking in brasil last year.
1. Alonso
2. +16,5s Vettel
3. +16.9s Webber
This result would have been impossible if Webber disobeyed team orders.
This is a propaganda-thread.
FrukostScones wrote:why, just because VET acted like Senna and some can't handle that.bhallg2k wrote:.
I never saw Senna kick a man while he was down, to take advantage of an unfair situation.FrukostScones wrote:
why, just because VET acted like Senna and some can't handle that.