mix2mix wrote:where i can find speed trap result for FP1?
Here http://www.formula1.com/results/season/ ... _trap.html
mix2mix wrote:where i can find speed trap result for FP1?
They have not tested this new front wing during free practice, I have not seen itmantikos wrote:Yes
heimana wrote:mercedes has too downforce, all top teams have no cascades on their front wing except mercedes
yes I'm agree but hamilton said "maybe we have too much downforce"mantikos wrote:heimana wrote:mercedes has too downforce, all top teams have no cascades on their front wing except mercedes
No one knows who has how much d/f
The cascades could be more important from a outwash flow conditioner perspective...if they made a new f/w for the GP then I am sure they considered the rear and front d/f levels in order to be balanced.
He also said the car "felt good". Typically F1 cars feel twitchy in the corners at Monza, further implying Mercedes might run too much downforce.heimana wrote:yes I'm agree but hamilton said "maybe we have too much downforce"mantikos wrote:heimana wrote:mercedes has too downforce, all top teams have no cascades on their front wing except mercedes
No one knows who has how much d/f
The cascades could be more important from a outwash flow conditioner perspective...if they made a new f/w for the GP then I am sure they considered the rear and front d/f levels in order to be balanced.
Then, Mercedes should have been running RBR very close in S2 and S3, which wasn't the case at all.turbof1 wrote: He also said the car "felt good". Typically F1 cars feel twitchy in the corners at Monza, further implying Mercedes might run too much downforce.
Too many straights. More downforce does not automatically mean you are ultimately faster in those sectors.mkay wrote:Then, Mercedes should have been running RBR very close in S2 and S3, which wasn't the case at all.turbof1 wrote: He also said the car "felt good". Typically F1 cars feel twitchy in the corners at Monza, further implying Mercedes might run too much downforce.
n smikle wrote:The Beam wing is influenced by the same on the RB9! Newey has so many admirers in rival teams. They can't help but to try his solutions.emmepi27 wrote:New beam wing
http://img3.auto-motor-und-sport.de/Mer ... 716380.jpg
From F2012 last year, who had the down sloped style beam wing first... Albeit the W04's is much prettier.techF1LES wrote:http://img2.auto-motor-und-sport.de/Hec ... 626827.jpg
Photo courtesy of: RACEPICTURES.COM
■ Copyright © Miltenburg/RACEPICTURES.COM 2012. All rights reserved.
■ Hosted at Auto, Motor und Sport
But RBR is the slowest team (although short gearing help them get to top speed faster).turbof1 wrote:Too many straights. More downforce does not automatically mean you are ultimately faster in those sectors.mkay wrote:Then, Mercedes should have been running RBR very close in S2 and S3, which wasn't the case at all.turbof1 wrote: He also said the car "felt good". Typically F1 cars feel twitchy in the corners at Monza, further implying Mercedes might run too much downforce.
Monza isnt the track to heat the tires instantly. Maybe this is a solution to help aid in the heat up of medium and hard tires without hefty downforce penalty.scarbs wrote:Mercedes have been running these rims at Monza with a black inner coating and a cross cut pattern forged into their inner face. Might be an aero or thermal solution...
http://scarbsf1.com/blog1/wp-content/up ... _rim-s.jpg