"Very poorly concealed knowledge"? Could you provide a link? Some details? Not attacking you, just would like to read more on this point.No, because it's a very poorly concealed knowledge that Mercedes will have a big advantage next year.
"Very poorly concealed knowledge"? Could you provide a link? Some details? Not attacking you, just would like to read more on this point.No, because it's a very poorly concealed knowledge that Mercedes will have a big advantage next year.
Holm86 wrote:I dont possess this knowledge. Could you please enlighten me in what this big advantage is??Jonnycraig wrote:
No, because it's a very poorly concealed knowledge that Mercedes will have a big advantage next year.
If your answer is going to be 100hp advantage then dont answer at all.
I'd suggest you try and get hold of one of Sky's practice coverages with Antony Davidson on...donskar wrote:"Very poorly concealed knowledge"? Could you provide a link? Some details? Not attacking you, just would like to read more on this point.No, because it's a very poorly concealed knowledge that Mercedes will have a big advantage next year.
Yep and the fact that even though Kubica was already a genuine front runner before his move, it was very entertaining to watch him in that Renault in 2010 competing with the front runners as the underdog pretty much. Much what I'm expecting what Hulk will do if he's in a similar car next year.raymondu999 wrote:Why? Because it was moving from Sauber to Enstone?
If this deal materializes, VDG will be in the Williams with large McGregor logos emblazoned on the car.Jonnycraig wrote:Back on the driver market, rumours in Holland that Marcel Boekhoorn is considering buying Wolffs Williams shares which would see his son-in-law Van der Garde in there, presumably replacing Bottas.
http://www.formule1.nl/nieuws/detail/bo ... -te-kopen/
Still writing this drivel I see? Kubica wasn't entirely convincing against Nick Heidfeld a lot of the time but it was pretty obvious who was heading where for those who knew what to look for. Ditto Hulkenberg.iotar__ wrote:I can't stand itcomparing Hulkenberg to Kubica is the biggest insult ever. If RK started F1 career by being comprehensively outpaced and outraced by ancient Barrichello...
I don't even know what that means. Alonso what? It's difficult to manage to put less substance and more randomness in so many words. BTW regards to mutual backslapping society that prefers cowardly and lazy "internet points" instead of putting thoughts into sentences, which I thought is the idea of forums.munudeges wrote:Still writing this drivel I see? Kubica wasn't entirely convincing against Nick Heidfeld a lot of the time but it was pretty obvious who was heading where for those who knew what to look for. Ditto Hulkenberg.iotar__ wrote:I can't stand itcomparing Hulkenberg to Kubica is the biggest insult ever. If RK started F1 career by being comprehensively outpaced and outraced by ancient Barrichello...
Oh and I'm sorry, but not only is Alonso McLaren bound in 2015 they will also be spending some time right now trying to bring that forward.
Kobayashi overtook Alonso and Buemi on the final lap in Valencia that year on fresher tyres. That's a circuit with even fewer overtaking opportunities than Singapore. So you are telling us that fresh tyres had nothing to do with Kobayashi's moves or Kubica's?iotar__ wrote: Examples? Singapore 2010 was dismissed as fresh tyres with grip advantage instead of praised as a classic overtaking clinic that it was. Bridgestones (I thought they were indestructible?), 6th best car (yes) and finish at 7th position.