Mandrake wrote:Gerhard Berger wrote:Here is a good analysis by Anthony Davidson of how Vettel struggled in early 2012 (particularly in qualifying) with the RB (which at the time, did not have the planted rear end that Vettel has become so accustomed to).
The biggest issue in early 2012 was the two faced handling of his car. In one situation it would grip, in the next it wouldn't. That way you cannot build trust into the car and thus not perform to your expectations.
But this should not be on Vettel, if you prefer it this way, Hamilton and all the others liking a loose rear they can work with are benefited. Button, as one we have concluded in this very forum, who doesn't like it will be worse off. I for one am looking especially forward to cars moving around a bit. Even in the late 90s, early 2000s the cars were sliding quite a lot. I liked that!
don't buy this at all with the advent of the automated super kers I think the engineers will be able to map to the drivers style , in other words smooth out the power delivery if that is what suits him best
so , to use button as the example quoted here , instead of using the electric power immediately on exiting the corner , loosening the tail , it is saved for later so that button can use his favoured smooth lines ..someone like hamilton will want it completely differently perhaps !
but one thing is for sure , it's going to be a steep learning curve for more than the drivers ! form at the beginning of the season may be illusory
my forecast ? RBR will stay as one of the top teams but lose it's dominance ; it seems inevitable that those who were most successful at exhaust blowing will lose the most , and no guesses as to who that was !! and williams were so bad at it that they improved without it ,even with a renault engine which contributed greatly to the RBR success!
will be having a look pre-season so see if good odds are available on button for the WDC .. as usual , won't be much to be made betting on the favourites
to the optimist a glass is half full ; to the pessimist a glass is half empty ; to the F1 engineer the glass is twice as big as it needs to be