The new V6 Turbo engine sounds

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.

What do you think of the new engine sounds?

Love it!
33
14%
Pretty good, better than the V8s
23
10%
Pretty good, but not as good as the V8s
27
11%
Acceptable
44
18%
Don't really like it
37
15%
They've taken its soul away
77
32%
 
Total votes: 241

rjsa
rjsa
51
Joined: 02 Mar 2007, 03:01

Re: The new engine sounds

Post

Wnhile FOM does not take it down:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS4Dh_EAfJI[/youtube]
:cry:

mnmracer
mnmracer
-26
Joined: 17 Sep 2011, 23:41

Re: The new engine sounds

Post

rjsa wrote:Wnhile FOM does not take it down:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS4Dh_EAfJI
:cry:
My heart bleeds :cry:

rjsa
rjsa
51
Joined: 02 Mar 2007, 03:01

Re: The new engine sounds

Post

Now look at the kind of view these guys have and guess how many will be there next year...

CHT
CHT
-6
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 05:24

Re: The new engine sounds

Post

rjsa wrote:Wnhile FOM does not take it down:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS4Dh_EAfJI
:cry:
Thanks for the video. I think the value for hosting F1 just drop by half.

User avatar
scuderiafan
11
Joined: 06 Nov 2010, 15:14
Location: United States

Re: The new engine sounds

Post

F1 doesn't need to be loud to be enjoyable.
"You're so angry that you throw your gloves down, and the worst part is; you have to pick them up again." - Steve Matchett

Patiently waiting...

langwadt
langwadt
35
Joined: 25 Mar 2012, 14:54

Re: The new engine sounds

Post

CHT wrote:
rjsa wrote:Wnhile FOM does not take it down:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS4Dh_EAfJI
:cry:
Thanks for the video. I think the value for hosting F1 just drop by half.

I read somewhere that the Australian organizers are looking if it can be considered breach of contract in that they
think they are not getting the product they paid for and Bernie is afraid he'll have to lower prices

Slife
Slife
0
Joined: 01 May 2009, 22:05

Re: The new engine sounds

Post

rjsa wrote:Wnhile FOM does not take it down:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS4Dh_EAfJI
:cry:
I feel like if I just heard the audio from that, I would have not identified the race to have F1 cars.

Agenda_Is_Incorrect
Agenda_Is_Incorrect
-5
Joined: 12 Jun 2010, 00:07

Re: The new engine sounds

Post

CHT wrote: You'd have all the road car manufacturers drift off in a few years and be left with the big developments going on in Sports Car racing.

The manufacturers are all moving towards hybrid technology of all types and F1 having a loud scream engine would just end up being an anachronism. F1 has to embrace the new power unit technology but also has to do a better job of selling it and including the fans in the spectacle.

I am enjoying hearing tyre squeal and all of the other noise that was drowned out by the engines.

As a TV watcher of F1 I lost nothing but I think the broadcasters should have access to much more telemetry about the PU systems and what the drivers/cars are doing at any given time.

The sound is not the issue for me.
I simply can't see all that hybrid thing, even with all the propaganda. Most manufacturers are still to have hybrid models (no surprise, they are yet so expensive only the biggest ones will make them) and maybe only in the US market they have any actual relevance. I can assure you that after all the manufacturers and green propaganda they are a mere curiosity so far in like 90% of the world. Even in Europe where you have people more willing to spend on a car and more concerned about fuel economy, they just buy diesels (and it's a much better choice).

Irony is, in the USA, major racing series are probably not even thinking about using hybrid systems on their cars. I don't see any drift off and as far as F1 is concerned, only Honda came back because of the new rules. Fact is, it's still a too restricted formula (no one can pull more power from the electrical part for instance) with too much costs and very ineffective as a mean to appear "clean/green". Renault was probably the only one to really like the idea of the new formula, while Ferrari complained of costs/sound and Mercedes was indifferent. Thing is, none of them really pushed for this new regulation. They wanted a new formula, with turbos, but not anything that radical

We could have a nice sounding engine in the current regulations tough, they could just restrict the fuel flow somewhat less and use a larger displacement. Nowadays not even hot hatches have moved to at least 2.0 liter, the ones displacing less than that being the cheapest/slowest ones. It's unreasonable to expect a nice racing engine of such low displacement. 30% more power as a result of larger displacement and a bit more fuel would make cars awesome to see, very fast and sound at least decent. More revs would come, which would help a lot too. They would still be around twice as efficient than the V8s and would justify the extra cost/weight. They wouldn't even be compared to GP2 cars like thay are being now

I'll tell you what, if audience goes down and sponsors too, now THAT will drift manufacturers off. F1 is not really relevant for some time now, if it gets low audience, bye bye
Shakeman wrote: TV viewers are easier to please as many might never experience what its like to be watching the race at the track.

When someone pay $1000 for a ticket to be seated right in front of the start and finish line, they would expect an experience of a life time. ie. when 22 screaming engines come to live.
Bang on. Tickets for F1 are always expensive and I would not bother spending a day under the sun, unconfortable and seeing the cars for only some seconds a lap to see/hear this. I would simply see it home or not even that and would buy tickets to a more enjoyable experience (like GP2/DTM/BTCC). F1's trademark was speed and noise. Not much left now, the cars are almost like Indy cars the way it is
CptPeanut wrote:I just find it strange that fans of one of the most high tech forms of motorsport are so resistant to progress/change.
Change is supposed to bring us to a better place. Change for the sake of changing is just more nowadays insanity
Roland Ehnström wrote:I seem to be in the minority, but I've got to say I like these engines a lot more than I expected to. I like how "mechanical" they sound (which is ironic considering that they are partly electric). I like how you can hear the turbo whine. I also like how you can hear the tires squeal and the crowd cheer.

Sure, they could increase the volume a bit, especially on the TV broadcast, but overall I like the sound of these engines more than I liked the V8:s.
Hearing the crowd is in fact cool, but tires are barely noticeable anyway. Performance tires actually don't have much of a squeal. The turbo whine is boring, it's nothing like a normal turbo. All in all, it's a loss

But do you actually drive? It sounds not mecanical at all, they sound JUST like an electrical appliance (vacuum cleaner)
I've been censored by a moderation team that rather see people dying and being shot at terrorist attacks than allowing people to speak the truth. That's racist apparently.

God made Trump win for a reason.

CHT
CHT
-6
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 05:24

Re: The new engine sounds

Post

On board sound comparison...
[youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbiBPfj-F5k[/youtube]

User avatar
McG
-19
Joined: 16 Feb 2011, 17:45

Re: The new engine sounds

Post

I like it better than the V8. There ls more going on sound wise just not as loud. Maybe it would have been cool to have each team have 1 car with a V10 and 1 with the new PU!
Finally, everyone knows that Red Bull is a joke and Max Verstappen is overrated.

User avatar
Kiril Varbanov
147
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 15:00
Location: Bulgaria, Sofia

Re: The new engine sounds

Post

CHT wrote:On board sound comparison...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbiBPfj-F5k
It's interesting to see the shift of the discussion. Now that the fears of cars not finishing at all have gone, we have all returned to the Sound issue.

While I agree that the new engines are strange hybrid between electrical appliance and a racing engine, everybody knew that the turbo will be a big silencer. The V8s were goners from the very beginning. That's not to say I don't like them, but they were painful to the ears, honestly, and absolutely irrelevant to today's car industry. Teams did not like them, too, as they don't bring new knowledge to be fed back into the engine's manufacturer portfolio.

The V6, on the other side, are pretty bearable to the ears, and I'd love to hear higher pitch. I mean, something can be done to spice up the sensation of hearing F1 engine. There is no drama now, but I believe a compromise exists.

bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: The new engine sounds

Post

Kiril Varbanov wrote:The V8s were...absolutely irrelevant to today's car industry...
It'll be a proud day in Stuttgart when Mercedes-Benz finally rolls out the new E-Class Wagon with high-downforce wing technology taken directly from its experiences competing in Formula One. I mean, if you can't pull at least 3 g on your way to the grocery store, why bother with even going in the first place, yanno?

The future is now.

:D

User avatar
joseff
11
Joined: 24 Sep 2002, 11:53

Re: The new engine sounds

Post

There is a way of forcing the teams to run higher revs. Right now, the fuel flow rate limit is a slope that goes from 0kg/h @ 0rpm to 100kg/h @10500rpm, which then plateaus all the way to 15000rpm. Change this limit to, say, 0.008 x revs, such that the rate limit becomes a straight line from 0kg/h @ 0rpm to 120kg/h @ 15000rpm. Then they *have* to run up to 15000.

I'm not sure how this will work out with the 8 fixed ratios rule though.

MadMatt
MadMatt
125
Joined: 08 Jan 2011, 16:04

Re: The new engine sounds

Post

rjsa wrote:Wnhile FOM does not take it down:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jS4Dh_EAfJI
:cry:
V8s rpm limited were already absolutely DULL, all the same sound. V10s or anything before the limited V8 era had proper sound.

But yea the difference is quite dramatic. Something everybody could expect, come on, what were they thinking, adding a turbo and reducing the rpm...

CHT
CHT
-6
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 05:24

Re: The new engine sounds

Post

Kiril Varbanov wrote:
CHT wrote:On board sound comparison...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbiBPfj-F5k
It's interesting to see the shift of the discussion. Now that the fears of cars not finishing at all have gone, we have all returned to the Sound issue.

While I agree that the new engines are strange hybrid between electrical appliance and a racing engine, everybody knew that the turbo will be a big silencer. The V8s were goners from the very beginning. That's not to say I don't like them, but they were painful to the ears, honestly, and absolutely irrelevant to today's car industry. Teams did not like them, too, as they don't bring new knowledge to be fed back into the engine's manufacturer portfolio.

The V6, on the other side, are pretty bearable to the ears, and I'd love to hear higher pitch. I mean, something can be done to spice up the sensation of hearing F1 engine. There is no drama now, but I believe a compromise exists.
For hardcore f1 fans, even if there is no engine sound, it will still be music to the ears. The only question now is how much F1 fans are now willing to pay to watch the V6 F1dancing around the track. The aussie has spoken, so lets wait to see what the malaysian thinks in 2 weeks time.