I am just glad I survived my H2, it was great in a straight line, cornering and stopping not so much
Frightening that for $20k you can buy a bike now that straight off the factory floor is quicker than GP bikes from only a few years ago.
Gatecrasher wrote:I am just glad I survived my H2, it was great in a straight line, cornering and stopping not so much
Frightening that for $20k you can buy a bike now that straight off the factory floor is quicker than GP bikes from only a few years ago.
As with all bikes it is 90% rider and 10% bike, or less if it has me on it The biggest change that I have seen on the old bikes vs new have been due to the tires, it is incredible the grip that modern race rubber gives.J.A.W. wrote: Yeah, certainly, current superbikes are a performance bargain, (& aint nothing wrong with cheap thrills - IMO)..
- yet the showroom stock units - while fast, are actually fairly sanitised..
.. with various built in electronic limiters to restrict wheel stands, lock-ups due to brake & clutch, top speed, etc,
& would be hard put to beat a top G.P. bike - from 25 years ago - or more, really..
If Kevin Cameron wrote an article about what he ate for breakfast it would be worth reading. Motorcycles are even better.J.A.W. wrote:Here is a Kevin Cameron CW article on the early US Superbikes..
http://www.cycleworld.com/2013/05/31/or ... ke-racing/
I note that even back in `77, the race speed of the Daytona winning Ducati Superbike..
.. was ~same as the best 250cc G.P. bike..
As a matter of interest G, I checked the lap records for Sydney Motorsport Park, a former Moto G.P. venue..Gatecrasher wrote:I am just glad I survived my H2, it was great in a straight line, cornering and stopping not so much
Frightening that for $20k you can buy a bike now that straight off the factory floor is quicker than GP bikes from only a few years ago.