Allan wrote:
where we can take our debate to Wink
the bottom line is, Renault's reaction was completely different than that of Mclaren's, and i think they deserve the same "initial" judgemnet as the one Mclaren had 5 months ago, i.e. not being punished!
So you are saying Mclaren's punishment was due to their reaction rather than the evidence? If so that would make sense because after reading the transcripts thoroughly, I am still to fathom what warranted the punishment let the magnitude of the punishment.
Wat's ironic though is that some of the people who defended that decision back then are now demanding a "fair" penalty for renault... i donno what do u guys wanna call it, double standards maybe?
Looking at it objectively, legally, faily and putting team loyalties aside, it would be double standards if, assuming currently reports are correct, renault were not punished at least as severely as Mcl were.
Quite frankly I think this latest thing is good in the long term for F1. As much as I do not want to see renault punished or given a hard time, Mclaren needs pursue this vigorously and very visibly (by any means necessary) because, sadly, this issue is not really about renault (or even mclaren for that matter), but about Mad Max in particular, the future and governance of the sport.