Yeah the nose is far too high to be from this year or even the last 2 years.roon wrote:I'm guessing its an RB8 or RB9 in these promotional videos, given the stepped nose. Can anyone tell? That the DRS actuator is missing might further confirm this frankenstein's role as a demonstration car.
I wonder if there are still loopholes this big to exploit. Here's hoping they went full Bowlby for 2017.henry wrote:For full disclosure I have also heard that Red Bull have increased the wheelbase moving the cockpit rearward and in doing so gained more space for barge boardy stuff. We will see.
I know... But it would be a decent looking car.djos wrote:Cool looking, but so many illegal ideas as to render it completely pointless.
The airbox is more eliptical than RB12, also the gap between sidepod and vertical winglet is larger compare to RB12 ( i think it just a camera angle? i ;m not sure)namao wrote:https://s29.postimg.org/796eftpuf/image.png
First pic of the new car. See the rear wing.
That's the 2017 tire testing mule, the RB13 will look very different imo.jagunx51 wrote:The airbox is more eliptical than RB12, also the gap between sidepod and vertical winglet is larger compare to RB12 ( i think it just a camera angle? i ;m not sure)namao wrote:https://s29.postimg.org/796eftpuf/image.png
First pic of the new car. See the rear wing.
http://i1376.photobucket.com/albums/ah3 ... 5wvwsx.jpg
cmiiw, Max's face doesnt look optimistic
Well of course - why would they finish the car last Thursday? They could spend an extra week developing it by not having it ready by then.lio007 wrote:http://www.f1today.net/nl/nieuws/f1/222 ... -barcelona
Very last minute approach from RBR:
# car weren't finished last Thursday, even some parts had to be made