bosyber wrote:From what I read, Hasegawa said Honda are happy with the new layout of the engine, and confident they can now make good progress.
Also, that they are at this moment not yet at their goal for Melbourne, but will be by the time of the race: being on par with where Mercedes was in 2016 in that race, ie. at the start of the season.
With that, they expect to be making good gains through the year. Enough to be competitive? That is where he said hearing (via Force India) that Mercedes made an unexpectedly good step in performance too, was unfortunate.
I don't think he specified the Australia race last year There is some uncertainty among articles as to whether he is referring to the end or the start of the season. But when asked if they could bridge the gap to Merc, this was his response:
"Not at the moment I think because I don't know how much gain Mercedes is hoping to make," Hasegawa said. "But of course we are aiming to achieve the top level of the PU, which is Mercedes at this moment, but we don't know how much power they are making now. But I am feeling that we are not behind from them, but I think we will catch up [with Mercedes' 2016 performance] at the beginning of the season."
Because he specifically refers to the power difference between the end of the last season and the start of this new season, his targets then seem relative to the current Merc output range, not from the start of last season. At least that is how I understand it.
As I recall, did Wazari not also say (some time ago) that the power output targets for the beginning of this season were to be to match or exceed the power of the Merc at the end of last season?
In any case, power is not all. If it is not fuel efficient, or does not finish a race, it doesn't matter so much. Some answers will come next week and some long running will be a welcome sign. But with a "90%" new engine, they surely will not fully understand it as they would like in real world conditions. So the questions for me are not power, but will it last. Can McLaren fully utilise that initial testing period or sit on the sidelines fixing leaks.
I would rather an engine slightly slower but that can run, at this stage, than something 30hp quicker that explodes. Without tokens, it seems to me that the focus is not now so much on getting power and adding reliability later, but that reliability for this engine is more important from the start than it has been in the past (For McLaren Honda's situation at least).
Bear in mind also that the rear of the McLaren seemed to prevent the power getting transferred down efficiently and that with a very good chassis like Red Bull, it is possible to be a strong competitor with (allegedly) the third best engine.