Unless Honda is 200hp down which wouldnt surprise me at all....mrluke wrote: ↑29 Mar 2017, 14:06I interpret this as saying that even if there was a 100hp difference that would only equate to 1.49 seconds although in reality the difference is less than 100hp.According to the latest information, in 2017 machines where the engine full opening rate and air resistance increased, the power has a 0.2 second / 10 kW (about 13.4 horsepower) impact on lap time. Even if the Honda's power unit is 100 horsepower inferior to Mercedes AMG (although there is not much difference in reality), the lap time is only 1.49 seconds difference. The difference of 2.2 seconds from the Bartheli / Buttas of the top in Q2 is found to be due to the inferior performance of both the car body and the power unit being inferior.
And further, I cant see why they are comparing to a Q2 time, the reference should be to pole.
Pole 1:22.188
ALO 1:25.452
Difference 3.3s of which no more than 1.5s is due to PU, leaving at least 1.8s from car.
The crux of the problem is how do you determine what the HP deficit is?GoranF1 wrote: ↑29 Mar 2017, 18:30Unless Honda is 200hp down which wouldnt surprise me at all....mrluke wrote: ↑29 Mar 2017, 14:06I interpret this as saying that even if there was a 100hp difference that would only equate to 1.49 seconds although in reality the difference is less than 100hp.According to the latest information, in 2017 machines where the engine full opening rate and air resistance increased, the power has a 0.2 second / 10 kW (about 13.4 horsepower) impact on lap time. Even if the Honda's power unit is 100 horsepower inferior to Mercedes AMG (although there is not much difference in reality), the lap time is only 1.49 seconds difference. The difference of 2.2 seconds from the Bartheli / Buttas of the top in Q2 is found to be due to the inferior performance of both the car body and the power unit being inferior.
And further, I cant see why they are comparing to a Q2 time, the reference should be to pole.
Pole 1:22.188
ALO 1:25.452
Difference 3.3s of which no more than 1.5s is due to PU, leaving at least 1.8s from car.
No no, that's Vandoorne, which kind of makes sense because Japanese phonetic pronunciation of Vandoorne sounds an awful lot like Bando
Hey, stop dreaming before writing comments..ziggy wrote: ↑29 Mar 2017, 19:38We all thought till now, that honda didn't use a mule car. But what if Mclaren is being used by Honda as a test mule? Apparently Honda developed a car in secret since 2009, even developed a hot blown diffuser, just to have the tech. Maybe thats why Mclaren demanded exclusive supply for the PU.
"With Honda about to open its new UK racing facility in Milton Keynes (below) it is hard to imagine that the engineers in Tochigi (themselves with a new facility) will not want to get involved in developing the whole car again and not just the power unit. How well this will be received at McLaren is another question"
Honda’s mystery F1 car
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/arti ... evealed/4/
Although the article is from 2014, I can assure its still opening many questions and also gives some answers. Enjoy reading
EDIT: I hope its the right thread here, otherwise please move the post...
Shady the comments that followed your post are correct however nobody mentions, that when an engine is changed on reliability grounds the design change is shared with all of the F1 teams. Therefore if you try to hide a performance upgrade it is very easy to copy.
Did you read all the 4 pages of the article? If not do it and come backmattia.bobbo wrote: ↑30 Mar 2017, 01:08Hey, stop dreaming before writing comments..ziggy wrote: ↑29 Mar 2017, 19:38We all thought till now, that honda didn't use a mule car. But what if Mclaren is being used by Honda as a test mule? Apparently Honda developed a car in secret since 2009, even developed a hot blown diffuser, just to have the tech. Maybe thats why Mclaren demanded exclusive supply for the PU.
"With Honda about to open its new UK racing facility in Milton Keynes (below) it is hard to imagine that the engineers in Tochigi (themselves with a new facility) will not want to get involved in developing the whole car again and not just the power unit. How well this will be received at McLaren is another question"
Honda’s mystery F1 car
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/arti ... evealed/4/
Although the article is from 2014, I can assure its still opening many questions and also gives some answers. Enjoy reading
EDIT: I hope its the right thread here, otherwise please move the post...
Honda can't make a half decent engine, and they are thinking of making a whole car themselves? Doesn't make any sense.
Engineers in tochigi hasn't been able to make a decent engine in 3 years, what makes you think their car will be better? The hot air diffuser story is not related with the rest.