Should then treat it as a test !!!GhostF1 wrote: ↑02 May 2017, 05:24It was quoted by Hasegawa that it was a software fault in the ERS and restarting on track didn't work. Alonso's radio he actually says he tried multiple times. They probably sorted it the moment it was backed into the garage for all we know, but by then it would of been pointless running.Alonso Fan wrote: ↑01 May 2017, 18:14Tbh I don't really care but I was correcting an incorrect assumption
Brawn showed that if you have a great chasis it can happen. OK, it won´t be the most updated Mercedes PU but it will be a powerful and realiable one. If McLaren can really build a race winner chasis they could make something good.
I think there were to much pressure on Alonso and on that periodo they strongly believed that their PU was strong enough....Vasconia wrote: ↑02 May 2017, 12:22Brawn showed that if you have a great chasis it can happen. OK, it won´t be the most updated Mercedes PU but it will be a powerful and realiable one. If McLaren can really build a race winner chasis they could make something good.
Sauber having Honda engines is was the most logic thing to happen, in 2015. First, build a good engine with a little team, without such a big pressure, then sign with a big one.
That was in a chassis and aero dominated period of F1 though, we are currently in a period where the engine is the most important. So unless McClaren's chassis and aero can be made better than Mercs to make up the difference in being a Merc customer compare to their works outfit with the best engine and fuel and oils etc for that engine then McClaren would be resigned to not winning the championship again unless engines become less important again in the furture.
There was a strange line in the contract requested from Sauber that McLaren would be required to produce the Transmission EVEN if they changed PUs. So McLaren are under contract to supply the transmissions to Sauber for the Honda Pu. Just throwing that out there cause it's just another expense they'd have to incur. Designing and producing 2 different transmissions.Diesel wrote: ↑02 May 2017, 10:03Contracts can easily be torn up, and the McLaren Honda contract almost certainly will. Sauber will run the Honda engines next year to keep them in the sport, McLaren are almost certainly going to switch back to Mercedes. Honda may have a contract with McLaren, but what's the point in continuing if the other party doesn't want to anymore? Sauber will be more than happy with the cheap engine supply, and Honda can continue to develop their engine without the constant public criticism.
It was a gamble, it could have paid off, at which point everyone would be lauding McLaren as geniuses for making the move to Honda. However, it hasn't worked and McLaren can't afford to wait any longer, they've already lost sponsorship and prize money and they look set to lose their star driver.
First of all, he never read the posts,we weren't talking about about last Sunday's race.mclaren111 wrote: ↑02 May 2017, 10:52Should then treat it as a test !!!GhostF1 wrote: ↑02 May 2017, 05:24It was quoted by Hasegawa that it was a software fault in the ERS and restarting on track didn't work. Alonso's radio he actually says he tried multiple times. They probably sorted it the moment it was backed into the garage for all we know, but by then it would of been pointless running.Alonso Fan wrote: ↑01 May 2017, 18:14
Tbh I don't really care but I was correcting an incorrect assumption
Mclaren don't have a great chassis.Vasconia wrote: ↑02 May 2017, 12:22Brawn showed that if you have a great chasis it can happen. OK, it won´t be the most updated Mercedes PU but it will be a powerful and realiable one. If McLaren can really build a race winner chasis they could make something good.
Sauber having Honda engines is what was the most logic thing to happen, in 2015. First, build a good engine with a little team, without such a big pressure, then sign with a big one.
#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!