Could be a temporal comeback until Honda builds a good PU? it could easy the pressure over Mclaren but I dont if this can happen.Lucky wrote: ↑12 May 2017, 19:42Go to Mercedes
http://www.autobild.de/artikel/formel-1 ... 54469.html
Could be a temporal comeback until Honda builds a good PU? it could easy the pressure over Mclaren but I dont if this can happen.Lucky wrote: ↑12 May 2017, 19:42Go to Mercedes
http://www.autobild.de/artikel/formel-1 ... 54469.html
One interesting nugget from the article: "AVL is supposed to have delivered 15 million euros of hardware to Japan"Lucky wrote: ↑12 May 2017, 19:42Go to Mercedes
http://www.autobild.de/artikel/formel-1 ... 54469.html
Sorry I can't find any after looking for them, saw it on the live TV feed Stoffel had flow vis on the underside of right hand side of the rear wing. New rear wing being tested probably.
It's about false promisesFrukostScones wrote: ↑12 May 2017, 21:35what is the problem with the failures? it is still testing for them, if it is still that bad in October, ok, but right now the level of flak and ALO disloyal sh*ttalk is unbearable.
McLaren seems to handle the whole situation rather bad. Autobild article is pretty revealing.
Team sport, so both.... But yeah, Honda's!!
They have been "testing" for three years now No other PU manufacturer had even close to this atrocious level of reliability even in their first year with the new PU regs.FrukostScones wrote: ↑12 May 2017, 21:35what is the problem with the failures? it is still testing for them, if it is still that bad in October, ok, but right now the level of flak and ALO disloyal sh*ttalk is unbearable.
McLaren seems to handle the whole situation rather bad. Autobild article is pretty revealing.
The question is how can u handle the situation when twice out of 4 races youre car was unable to start, and when one of them barely made it twice to the finish, not to mention the 3 steps back they have made with the engine this season, returning to the notorious 15 season level again... 3rd season in a row there is talk about how the engine will be fixed in last stages of the season, there were many talks that this new version will show some results allready in Spain, overall part of the predictions were true afterall, the new unit is the fastest one to fail, giving up in 3 corners...FrukostScones wrote: ↑12 May 2017, 21:35what is the problem with the failures? it is still testing for them, if it is still that bad in October, ok, but right now the level of flak and ALO disloyal sh*ttalk is unbearable.
McLaren seems to handle the whole situation rather bad. Autobild article is pretty revealing.
It don't take Sherlock Holmes!
If that were to happen, i think it is a bad move.Vasconia wrote: ↑12 May 2017, 19:54Could be a temporal comeback until Honda builds a good PU? it could easy the pressure over Mclaren but I dont if this can happen.Lucky wrote: ↑12 May 2017, 19:42Go to Mercedes
http://www.autobild.de/artikel/formel-1 ... 54469.html
My response was in fact to those who were claiming it could be McLaren's fault for not assembling it properlyDel Boy wrote: ↑12 May 2017, 22:59It don't take Sherlock Holmes!
Honda move is right decision. There are wrong things in this basically right desicion. May be there are.SR71 wrote: ↑13 May 2017, 00:02I'm sorry but if Red Bull can win as a customer there is no excuse Mclaren cannot.
Naturally Ron would pronounce a bunch of ronspeak about why he was trying to become a works team and it's a sound philosophy BUT not the only path in F1.
If MAC has half the talent and resources they claim they should be regular winners with a Mercedes lump. End of.