Well I would argue the mistake was leaving the inside open. Either way Vandoorne looked amateurish there.Jef Patat wrote: ↑29 May 2017, 20:18Did you watch/read any post race interview. Perez made a move on Vandoorne. You are saying the inverse. Perez dived to the inside and made it work. Stoffel got nowhere to go.Manoah2u wrote: ↑29 May 2017, 18:47It was an embarrasing mistake. Should have had the patience to warm up the tires and wait for a try on a safer moment. He's not driving for Sauber, he's driving for Mclaren, even if Mclaren is not in form right now, it's still that very same team.
Everybody knows that coming out of the safety car period cools down tires and thus less grip. You don't go banzai like that, especially that corner. Should have used either tactics or pushed his opponent into an error.
Still, a weekend to forget.
diffuser wrote: ↑29 May 2017, 18:45Remember I'm just talking about the Chassis ability(so forget all the other stuff that happened).
You should not overthink Monaco...especially this year it was about tire usage. And we already had pages of discussions about what Chassis actually means and how you can distinguish it from Aero.
Here we have a clear picture: The McLaren war set up to be as hard as possible to the tires, Button's SS was done after 35laps and he lost contact to the Sauber...this surely helped to warm up the tires for Q. Teams battling for podiums can not do this and on another track you can not do these stunts either. So not much to read into the "Chassis"
Van was driving quite often and good in Monaco in other series. I can picture Alo being behind Ric, but I do not see the McLaren doing a 1:12 in anyone hands.
I was not answering you, I was replying to whoever said Mclaren could've gotten a podium which is crazy especially with penalties and even if not. Yes Splitting the RB could maybe be possible although that lap of stiffer was probably on the limits.diffuser wrote: ↑29 May 2017, 18:45Remember I'm just talking about the Chassis ability(so forget all the other stuff that happened).Big Mangalhit wrote: ↑29 May 2017, 14:35
So you are sure we could have McLaren on podium? I think that is very very much optimistic. Even if he would qualify 3 which is already quite some feat I think during the race the Mclaren pace drops a lot in compound mode. so he would be susceptible to overtakes in the pit, either he would cover and undercut or overcut but both red bulls and saint would have the pace to make it work. Some points would be attainable maybe and that is already something.
Also I am not even talking about the MGU-H penalty, I doubt he could overtake the whole field from the pit lane.
Also, I used the word "chance".
and I didn't say podium I said split RB. I was talk about Quali...
Vandoorne did a 1:13.249 and Ricardo a 1:12.998. ALO has been a Min of .3 faster than Vandoorne. Monaco is a short track which makes the .3 harder to make up but V is a rookie at Monaco which is big.
The expected updates should reduce this gap so I still have some hopes to see a good performance in Hungary.basti313 wrote: ↑29 May 2017, 18:01
Forget about Hungary. They loose 1-2sec on the main straight. This can be overcome in Q, but in the race they are a sitting duck.
Singapore may be a chance, but they will need again opponents crashing to score there. Also for Singapore you need some power on the chain.
Will new PU ready for Silvestone?
You are not wrong
McLaren is expecting updates that should reduce the gap for how many years now?Vasconia wrote: ↑30 May 2017, 11:56The expected updates should reduce this gap so I still have some hopes to see a good performance in Hungary.basti313 wrote: ↑29 May 2017, 18:01
Forget about Hungary. They loose 1-2sec on the main straight. This can be overcome in Q, but in the race they are a sitting duck.
Singapore may be a chance, but they will need again opponents crashing to score there. Also for Singapore you need some power on the chain.
Right now in this moment i believe they are in no desperate need of chipping their quali speed (ofcourse it doesnt hurt at all if they do). Their main problem remains with sustaining the speed during the race. I saw a pattern now in few races in a row where it was clearly seen that at some point they were able to follow the car infront, than a period of lossing time happens where they fall back to 5 sec gap, or more and then gaining back practically catching the car infront again (before the pitting time), so there must be again alot of fuel saving involved and when they climb back to the green they push again catching the guy infront.godlameroso wrote: ↑30 May 2017, 18:25The updates have worked, what they introduced in Spain and Monaco have certainly made the car faster, the engine is slightly improved, but the chassis is much better than when the season started, they were 2.6 seconds off the pace in Australia, they were 1.7 seconds off the pace in Spain, they gained another .2 in Monaco. Frankly I don't think there will be a big update from the engine, I just don't see it, they'll just chip away a little at a time, I don't think we'll see a .4 second jump from the engine out of nowhere(although it would be incredibly satisfying if they did). 14 races left on the calendar 5 months left in the season, they just need to find .2 sec relative to their competition every month to be up there. A tenth from the engine and a tenth from the chassis should be enough, and that will put them in a good position for next year.