Forget the chassis. If we looked strictly at the PU. You'd have to say that the ODDs are about 5-15% higher that Renault VS Honda will be competitive. Just cause Renault already are.Phil wrote: ↑04 Sep 2017, 16:03Thanks Thunders. While I don't disagree that the shareholders of McLaren are very wealthy, I do have my doubts over if "podium finishes" will be any more of a probability with a Renault engine. We have 2 Mercedes engined cars and 2 Ferrari. Statistically, these cars will already occupy the top 4 spots as a result of a better engine. With a Renault engine, they will be in direct competition with RedBull, who, I'm sorry to say, just seems more capable. Even if we assume they could equal RedBull (which would be very impressive in my book), it still means they'd be fighting for position 5 to 8 more often than not.
Renault engine or not, there's no way I can see them battling for wins even under the most optimistic circumstances. And when that sets in AND they've dumped the millions by Honda, what then?
I absolutely think so. In fact, I believe Red Bull will not hesitate jumping to a Honda works deal if the possibility would be there. I'd not be surprised if it would be when Honda would finally hit the right spot. Honda's worse days are over. The only way now is forward.Alonso Fan wrote: ↑04 Sep 2017, 16:12Slightly OT but who here still thinks a red bull Honda works deal is sweet and lucrative?
this is doable with Williams Paddy lowe.diffuser wrote: ↑04 Sep 2017, 16:41
Brawn was hired by Honda a couple years before. He was running the Honda team. The whole year before Honda had no updates, At the time (Honda chassis/Brawn) was putting everything into the following year. When economic issues hit and Honda decided to leave F1. They left Brawn with whatever funding they had paid him and pulled PU. Brawn pleaded with Honda to no avail. He said they had a really good car/chassis and would be very close to the top. At that point he got the PU from Merc and rebranded the car Brawn.
In reality it was the Brawn Designed chassis with Honda funding that won that year.
or what prevent Newey from intervene?!!JonoNic wrote: ↑04 Sep 2017, 17:04If Mclaren gets the Renault PU then it will be a straight swap with TR. With TR maybe using Honda. That means customer Renault PU for Mclaren and not a works one. If you think that the TR chassis is bad then you are naive. The TR chassis is almost as good as the RB but their results differ so much.
I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to say. I still think that the Mclaren and TR chassis are more or less equal. Those two teams will just swap results.loner wrote:or what prevent Newy from intervene?!!JonoNic wrote: ↑04 Sep 2017, 17:04If Mclaren gets the Renault PU then it will be a straight swap with TR. With TR maybe using Honda. That means customer Renault PU for Mclaren and not a works one. If you think that the TR chassis is bad then you are naive. The TR chassis is almost as good as the RB but their results differ so much.
lets say Redbull-Honda is the grand scheme for 2019 Newey sure will cooperate in TR chassis for the 2019 switchJonoNic wrote: ↑04 Sep 2017, 17:14I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to say. I still think that the Mclaren and TR chassis are more or less equal. Those two teams will just swap results.loner wrote:or what prevent Newy from intervene?!!JonoNic wrote: ↑04 Sep 2017, 17:04If Mclaren gets the Renault PU then it will be a straight swap with TR. With TR maybe using Honda. That means customer Renault PU for Mclaren and not a works one. If you think that the TR chassis is bad then you are naive. The TR chassis is almost as good as the RB but their results differ so much.
It can only work if STR agree to a swap with McLaren the Renault PU for Honda PU. There are only 3 Renault PU allocations allowed. STR has 1. Forget everything else, it has come down to this.JonoNic wrote: ↑04 Sep 2017, 17:04If Mclaren gets the Renault PU then it will be a straight swap with TR. With TR maybe using Honda. That means customer Renault PU for Mclaren and not a works one. If you think that the TR chassis is bad then you are naive. The TR chassis is almost as good as the RB but their results differ so much.
RedBull would agree in an instance. For them it's the best way to get an independent PU. STR would buy them time to let it mature (something McLaren should have done with Manor back in 2015). RedBull isn't Renaults priority, their own works team is. RedBull likes to be on number one, McLaren should have that same ambition.diffuser wrote: ↑04 Sep 2017, 17:20It can only work if STR agree to a swap with McLaren the Renault PU for Honda PU. There are only 3 Renault PU allocations allowed. STR has 1. Forget everything else, it has come down to this.JonoNic wrote: ↑04 Sep 2017, 17:04If Mclaren gets the Renault PU then it will be a straight swap with TR. With TR maybe using Honda. That means customer Renault PU for Mclaren and not a works one. If you think that the TR chassis is bad then you are naive. The TR chassis is almost as good as the RB but their results differ so much.
I see what you mean and agree with thatloner wrote:lets say Redbull-Honda is the grand scheme for 2019 Newey sure will cooperate in TR chassis for the 2019 switch
won't that make TR chassis even better