It is one thing to complain .harjan wrote: ↑15 Sep 2017, 13:23Weird right- you deliver an engine that's unreliable and underpowered to one of the most successful teams in F1 and they start complaining after 3 years..
I'm very very happy. Hope Honda finds it feet in the more relaxed environment STR will bring and more than happy to see McLaren can start fighting for podiums again.
For all of you wanting Mclaren to do bad, or even Honda. May I remind you that the partnership was broken by the two sides, Mclaren for wanting Honda to deliver more that they could and Honda for promising more that they could give.etusch wrote: ↑15 Sep 2017, 13:36Wonderful news for me because my first concern was seeing Honda in F1. With this deal Honda's F1 future guaranteed. I like to see them even if back of the grid. Of course prefer to see them winning.
Other thing that I am happy is McLaren won't benefit from Honda's possible development. I say so because I don't want to see them winning with Honda after so much insult.
I hope Honda will do their job good and also support Toro Rosso to beat McLaren with a good chassis.
It was fairly obvious that it needed time. These engines are very complex, which simply means you start on a back foot if you enter a year later.
I'm calling it now; Toro Rosso will outscore McLaren in 2018. The Honda might be the worst engine, but the Renault isn't all that much better, and is actually the worst engine out of the 3 choices they had.I'm very very happy. Hope Honda finds it feet in the more relaxed environment STR will bring and more than happy to see McLaren can start fighting for podiums again.
Apparently Porsche isn't heading towards Red Bull. Christian Horner said that they have somithing to announce very soon themselfes and that it won't be Porsche or Honda. It will have to do with the car company they're working with.Mad wrote: ↑15 Sep 2017, 12:48Porche seems to be heading towards Redbull, so unless Mclaren pours their own money into making their own/Cosworth engines, midfield is where they will stay.dren wrote: ↑15 Sep 2017, 12:47Yes, this is what I was getting at. Ironic, that the decline started the last time Fred was in the car. I remember when people thought Hamilton was crazy for jumping ship to Mercedes.Jacinto wrote: ↑14 Sep 2017, 23:12
Mclaren decline goes way back to 2007. Spygate started the chain of events that brought Mclaren to where it is today.
Until 2007, Mclaren was Mercedes "works team", and had been so for more than a decade. I believe that Mercedes was a Mclaren´s shareholder.
After that scandal, Mercedes set to establish his own team, buying Brawn GP and renaming it "Mercedes AMG Petronas"; Mclaren become just another customer and started the path to midfield trailing his former nemesis, Williams.
Honda was Mclaren´s last chance to return to greatness under current engine rules. Now, it´s clear that Mclaren decided to be midfielder, at least until 2021.
This is the most flawed argument possible.wesley123 wrote: ↑15 Sep 2017, 14:00
It was fairly obvious that it needed time. These engines are very complex, which simply means you start on a back foot if you enter a year later.
The unnecessary pressure, and essentially all the blame for their misfortunes in the past three years(which is completely unreasonable when you consider the downward spiral they have had since 2013), McLaren put on Honda isn't helping much either. Of course it's not going to work if you don't actually bother to work together.
I'm calling it now; Toro Rosso will outscore McLaren in 2018. The Honda might be the worst engine, but the Renault isn't all that much better, and is actually the worst engine out of the 3 choices they had.
And McLaren has been running behind the development cycle since 2009. They always had to rely on silver bullets to be competitive since the 2009 rule change. An engine change, which also removes a whole lot of technical support as they wont be a factory team anymore, doesn't magically change that.
I don't know why it has become McLarens goal to destroy everything Dennis has (re)built.
Because they don't announce it when you or I feel it's necessary, they announce it when it suits them as it's their business, literally.Restomaniac wrote: ↑15 Sep 2017, 14:12I'll say one thing about this whole situation. Why when it was clear midweek it was sorted did they delay it? It was well known and the info was bang on, all that happened was that we ended up with a bunch drivers having to lie with the constant line of 'I don't know' when they all obviously did. I counted up at least 7 Hulk, Sainz, Palmer, Ricciardo, Kvyat, Verstappen and Alonso. Just announce it on Thursday instead of the pantomime we have just witnessed.
By your last post you came across like you do not know what happened as did the poster you quoted. A very inaccurate conversation was going on between you two.
It has nothing to do about when I feel it's necessary. It's about a lack of logic.RS200E wrote: ↑15 Sep 2017, 14:29Because they don't announce it when you or I feel it's necessary, they announce it when it suits them as it's their business, literally.Restomaniac wrote: ↑15 Sep 2017, 14:12I'll say one thing about this whole situation. Why when it was clear midweek it was sorted did they delay it? It was well known and the info was bang on, all that happened was that we ended up with a bunch drivers having to lie with the constant line of 'I don't know' when they all obviously did. I counted up at least 7 Hulk, Sainz, Palmer, Ricciardo, Kvyat, Verstappen and Alonso. Just announce it on Thursday instead of the pantomime we have just witnessed.
The question we should ask ourselves is why we are so impatient.